Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Does visual attention select objects or locations?

S P Vecera1, M J Farah

  • 1Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213-3890.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. General
|June 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cortical differentiation and neurocognitive development: The parcellation conjecture.

Behavioural processes·2014
Same author

Brain Activity Underlying Mental Imagery: Event-related Potentials During Mental Image Generation.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same author

The development of inhibition of return in early infancy.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same author

Development of spontaneous alternation in infancy.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same author

Savings in relearning face-name associations as evidence for "covert recognition" in prosopagnosia.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same author

Visual Object Representation: Interpreting Neurophysiological Data within a Computational Framework.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same journal

Executive function and social behavior: Causal evidence from loading working memory and inhibitory control.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

Correction to "Your research is public engagement: A case for more intentional science communication in research with human subjects" by Vaughn (2026).

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

Correction to "Costs and benefits of acting extraverted: A randomized controlled trial" by Jacques-Hamilton et al. (2019).

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

Conveying (discrete) emotionality with novel words.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

Physical actions shape moral choices: Environment-directed movements reduce cheating in young children.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

From chunks to schemas: Learning in the Hebb repetition paradigm.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
See all related articles

Attention may select objects or locations based on the task. Research confirms object-based selection in some tasks, but location-based selection in others, suggesting flexible attentional mechanisms.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Attention

Background:

  • Debate exists on whether attention is primarily location-based or object-based.
  • J. Duncan's (1984) research suggested object-based selection in specific tasks.
  • Understanding attentional selection is crucial for cognitive processing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether attentional selection is object-based or location-based.
  • To clarify the conditions under which object-based versus location-based selection occurs.
  • To determine if attentional limitations depend on stimulus representation.

Main Methods:

  • Replicated J. Duncan's (1984) shape discrimination task.
  • Employed a location-based filtering manipulation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilized a cued detection task with Duncan's objects.

    • Main Results:

    • Confirmed object-based selection in Duncan's original task, independent of location-based filtering.
    • Demonstrated location-based selection when using Duncan's objects in a cued detection task.
    • Findings indicate that attentional selection is not monolithic.

    Conclusions:

    • Attentional selection mechanisms are flexible and task-dependent.
    • Object-based and location-based attentional selection are not mutually exclusive.
    • The type of stimulus representation influences attentional limitations.