Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluating generalist education programs: a conceptual framework. Generalist program evaluation working group

L V Rubenstein1, A Fink, L Gelberg

  • 1Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles UCLA.

Journal of General Internal Medicine
|April 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Target Trial Emulation to Assess Oral Drug Safety.

Journal of dental research·2026
Same author

Use of a tibial osseointegrated prosthesis as a limb salvage method in two dogs.

Australian veterinary journal·2025
Same author

Detection of minimal residual disease and prediction of recurrence in breast cancer using a plasma-only circulating tumor DNA assay.

ESMO open·2025
Same author

The efficacy of sacituzumab govitecan and trastuzumab deruxtecan on stable and active brain metastases in metastatic breast cancer patients-a multicenter real-world analysis.

ESMO open·2024
Same author

Prevention of severe immune-related colitis caused by combined immune checkpoint inhibition using vedolizumab: A case report.

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2023
Same author

Hyperprogression of Merkel cell carcinoma after avelumab treatment.

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2023
Same journal

Impact of Health Insurance Coverage on Diabetes Care Quality: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Disparities in U.S. Adults with Type 2 Diabetes.

Journal of general internal medicine·2026
Same journal

Assessment of Physician Advocacy Engagement: A Scoping Review and Proposal of an Assessment Tool.

Journal of general internal medicine·2026
Same journal

Relative Burden of Social Determinants of Health on Diverse Populations of Health Resources and Services Administration Health Centers.

Journal of general internal medicine·2026
Same journal

Addressing Moral Distress Among Gender-Affirming Healthcare Professionals.

Journal of general internal medicine·2026
Same journal

Trainee-Led Patient Education to Increase Advance Care Planning in a Geriatric Primary Care Clinic.

Journal of general internal medicine·2026
Same journal

Scholarly Outcomes of a Small Projects Grant Program.

Journal of general internal medicine·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces a framework and principles for evaluating generalist education programs. A pilot study confirmed expert consensus on core competencies, guiding future program evaluations.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Program Evaluation

Background:

  • Generalist education programs aim to train healthcare professionals with broad clinical skills.
  • Evaluating these programs is crucial for ensuring quality and effectiveness in healthcare delivery.
  • Existing evaluation methods may not adequately capture the nuances of generalist training.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a conceptual framework for evaluating generalist education programs.
  • To establish guiding principles for effective program evaluation.
  • To illustrate these principles with a pilot study assessing generalist competencies.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a conceptual framework and guiding principles for program evaluation.
  • Application of the framework in a pilot study involving expert consensus.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Descriptive and research evaluation approaches were considered.

    • Main Results:

    • Expert pediatricians, general internists, and family practitioners reached consensus on key generalist competencies.
    • The pilot study demonstrated the feasibility of evaluating programs based on agreed-upon competencies.
    • The study explored evaluation designs tailored to these competencies.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed framework and principles offer a structured approach to generalist education evaluation.
    • Consensus on core competencies is achievable and forms a basis for robust evaluation.
    • Effective evaluation is essential for advancing generalist medical education and practice.