Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Dental iatrogenesis

H R Stanley1

  • 1College of Dentistry, University of Florida, Department of Oral Diagnostic Sciences, Gainesville 32610.

International Dental Journal
|February 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Dental material biocompatibility testing reveals high-speed cutting is best. Condensing pressure and certain resin composites increase pulpal response, while bonding agents offer protection. Minimize iatrogenic effects for better patient outcomes.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pulp capping with a modified bioglass formula (#A68-modified).

American journal of dentistry·2001
Same author

Criteria for standardizing and increasing credibility of direct pulp capping studies.

American journal of dentistry·1998
Same author

The disastrous effects of the "total etch" technique in vital pulp capping in primates.

American journal of dentistry·1998
Same author

The road to pulp biology research: a personal odyssey.

Journal of dental research·1998
Same author

Adherence of "stuck" restorations to demineralized dentin following use of experimental primers.

The Journal of prosthetic dentistry·1997
Same author

Using 45S5 bioglass cones as endosseous ridge maintenance implants to prevent alveolar ridge resorption: a 5-year evaluation.

The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants·1997
Same journal

Validity of a Combined General and Oral Health Indicator for Vulnerability.

International dental journal·2026
Same journal

Letter to the Editor on the e-SEM Programme: Methodological Considerations and Critical Perspectives on a Theory-Driven Digital Oral Health Intervention by Acosta and Pisarnturakit.

International dental journal·2026
Same journal

Electric vs Manual Toothbrushing Effects on QLF-Assessed Plaque in Smokers and Non-Smokers: A 24-Week RCT.

International dental journal·2026
Same journal

CBCT-Based Clinico-Radiomic Nomogram Predicting Preoperative Mandibular Third Molar Difficulty: Development/Validation.

International dental journal·2026
Same journal

Refusal of Hospital-Based Oral Cancer Treatment Driven by Health Beliefs in Pakistan: A Qualitative Study.

International dental journal·2026
Same journal

Pulpal Pressure Aggravates Pulpitis by Mechano-Inflammatory Signal Synergy.

International dental journal·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Dental Materials Science
  • Biocompatibility Testing
  • Restorative Dentistry

Background:

  • Dental procedures can cause pulpal and dentinal responses, leading to iatrogenic effects.
  • Developing tests for biocompatibility is crucial for reducing harm.
  • Understanding material and technique interactions with dental tissues is essential.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the biocompatibility of various dental materials and techniques.
  • To identify factors influencing pulpal and dentinal responses during dental restorations.
  • To provide evidence-based recommendations for minimizing iatrogenic effects in dentistry.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of high-speed versus low-speed tooth cutting techniques with coolant.
  • Assessment of pulpal responses to different restorative material condensation pressures.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of pulpal responses to chemically self-cured versus visible light-cured resin composites.
  • Investigation of pulp irritation from various dental cements and conditioning agents.

    • Main Results:

    • High-speed tooth cutting techniques demonstrated superior outcomes compared to low-speed techniques.
    • Increased pressure during restorative material condensation intensified pulpal responses.
    • Chemically self-cured resin composites induced greater pulpal response than light-cured equivalents.
    • Most dental cements were irritating to the pulp, especially when placed close to it.
    • Bonding agents showed a protective effect against subsequent restorative materials.

    Conclusions:

    • Clinicians should prioritize high-speed cutting and incremental curing of light-activated composites.
    • Minimizing condensation pressure and selecting appropriate materials can reduce pulpal irritation.
    • The use of bonding agents is recommended for enhanced protection of dental pulpal tissues.