Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

New techniques in chest radiography

H S Glazer1, E Muka, S S Sagel

  • 1Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.

Radiologic Clinics of North America
|July 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

PACS workbench at Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology (MIR). 1983.

Journal of digital imaging·2003
Same author

Results of and comments on the 2000 survey of the American Association of Academic Chief Residents in Radiology.

Academic radiology·2001
Same author

Assessment of visually lossless irreversible image compression: comparison of three methods by using an image-comparison workstation.

Radiology·2000
Same author

Perceived fidelity of compressed and reconstructed radiological images: a preliminary exploration of compression, luminance, and viewing distance.

Journal of digital imaging·1998
Same author

Detection of CT-proved pulmonary nodules: comparison of selenium-based digital and conventional screen-film chest radiographs.

Radiology·1998
Same author

Lung volume reduction surgery: comparison of preoperative radiologic features and clinical outcome.

Radiology·1997
Same journal

Orbital Imaging.

Radiologic clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Imaging, Management, and Treatment of Orbital Trauma.

Radiologic clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Imaging Findings after Multidisciplinary Treatment for Orbital and Ocular Adnexal Cancers.

Radiologic clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Orbital Tumors: What the Radiologist Needs to Know from the Orbital Surgeon's Perspective.

Radiologic clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Multidisciplinary Management of Tumors of the Orbit.

Radiologic clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Skull Base, Bone, Pituitary-Regions around Orbit that Affect Vision.

Radiologic clinics of North America·2026
See all related articles

Digital radiography advances like AMBER and storage phosphor systems offer improved chest radiograph quality. Storage phosphor systems show promise for digital imaging integration and picture archiving and communication systems.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging Technology
  • Digital radiography

Background:

  • Film-screen radiography has advanced with technologies like InSight and AMBER (beam equalization radiography), enhancing standard chest radiograph quality.
  • While AMBER improves visibility of mediastinal and retrocardiac/retrodiaphragmatic lung regions, its cost and reliability are debated.
  • Storage phosphor systems excel in bedside radiography, offering consistent image quality across exposures and robust image processing, despite lower spatial resolution.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of advanced digital radiography techniques on chest imaging.
  • To explore the potential of storage phosphor systems in routine chest radiography and digital archiving.
  • To assess the role of picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) in improving patient care through rapid image access.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of film-screen radiography (InSight) and beam equalization radiography (AMBER) for chest imaging.
  • Evaluation of storage phosphor systems for bedside and routine chest radiography.
  • Assessment of digital imaging integration into picture archiving and communication systems (PACS).

Main Results:

  • Advanced film-screen systems improve standard chest radiograph quality.
  • AMBER offers improved visibility but faces cost and reliability challenges.
  • Storage phosphor systems provide consistent quality in bedside settings and are poised for wider adoption in routine chest radiography.
  • Digital imaging via storage phosphor systems is suitable for PACS integration, enabling remote display and faster access.

Conclusions:

  • Digital radiography, including storage phosphor systems, is likely to see increased use in standard chest radiography.
  • Storage phosphor digital imaging is a viable method for integrating images into PACS, enhancing workflow and patient care.
  • The gradual implementation of PACS, driven by cost, will likely begin in specialized networks like ICU to radiology departments.