Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The effect of secondary task load on visual sampling behaviour

M Donk1

  • 1Department of Psychology, RWTH Aachen, Germany.

Ergonomics
|June 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The patient's view on rare disease trial design - a qualitative study.

Orphanet journal of rare diseases·2019
Same author

The nature of the global effect beyond the first eye movement.

Vision research·2015
Same author

Visual marking beside the mark: prioritizing selection by abrupt onsets.

Perception & psychophysics·2001
Same author

Illusory conjunctions die hard: a reply to Prinzmetal, Diedrichsen, and Ivry (2001).

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2001
Same author

Feature localization and identification.

Acta psychologica·2001
Same author

Human monitoring behavior in a multiple-instrument setting: independent sampling, sequential sampling or arrangement-dependent sampling.

Acta psychologica·1994
Same journal

Identification of systemic barriers, facilitators and adaptations to effective record-keeping: a South African primary healthcare clinic case study.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Layer-specific facial soft-tissue thickness in 1174 Chinese adults: Implications for finite-element headforms and ergonomic design.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

The dual effects of information presentation speed on operator performance in dynamic tasks: a study in supervisory control and data acquisition interfaces.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Evaluating generative AI teaching assistants in simulated learning environments: how instructor type and support type affect students' perceptions.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Swipe smart, not hard: hand health of smartphone users in a university population.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Couriers' work-related musculoskeletal disorders and psychological distress: Insights for work errors and traffic safety.

Ergonomics·2026
See all related articles

Periodical sampling of instruments stems from imperfect internal representations, not a strategy to manage information overload. This finding clarifies observer behavior in monitoring tasks.

Area of Science:

  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Information Processing

Background:

  • Observer sampling behavior is crucial for understanding human interaction with dynamic systems.
  • Previous research suggested sampling might be a strategy to cope with information overload.
  • The internal representation of dynamic instruments remains a key area of investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine if periodical sampling arises from an imperfect internal representation or a strategic response to overload.
  • To investigate the influence of external task load on instrument sampling behavior.

Main Methods:

  • A dual-task experiment was conducted involving instrument monitoring and a tracking task.
  • Participants monitored either fast or slow-changing instruments.

Related Experiment Videos

  • External load was manipulated via difficult, easy, or no tracking task conditions.

    • Main Results:

    • Sampling behavior was largely independent of the external load from the tracking task.
    • The speed of the instrument being monitored did not significantly alter sampling frequency in relation to load.
    • Results suggest internal factors are primary drivers of sampling patterns.

    Conclusions:

    • Periodical sampling is primarily driven by limitations in the internal representation of dynamic instruments.
    • Observer sampling is not a strategic adaptation to overcome situational overload.
    • Findings contribute to models of human information processing and monitoring performance.