Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The word without the tachistoscope

W Prinzmetal1, B Silvers

  • 1Psychology Department, University of California, Berkeley 94804.

Perception & Psychophysics
|March 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Illusory conjunctions are alive and well: a reply to Donk (1999).

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2001
Same author

The Ponzo illusion and the perception of orientation.

Perception & psychophysics·2001
Same author

The tilt-constancy theory of visual illusions.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2001
Same author

Mapping symbols to response modalities: interference effects on Stroop-like tasks.

Perception & psychophysics·1998
Same author

Dividing attention between the color and the shape of objects.

Perception & psychophysics·1998
Same author

The phenomenology of attention. 2. Brightness and contrast.

Consciousness and cognition·1997
Same journal

Response organization in selective adaptation to speech sounds.

Perception & psychophysics·2014
Same journal

Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Simple and contingent adaptation effects for place of articulation in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory property detectors and processing place features in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Visual working memory for line orientations and face identities.

Perception & psychophysics·2008
See all related articles

The word-superiority effect arises from distinct factors influencing word recognition versus letter identification. Both word-superiority and word-detection effects rely on letter discrimination mechanisms.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Perception
  • Human Information Processing

Background:

  • The word-superiority effect demonstrates that recognizing letters is easier within the context of a word than in isolation.
  • Previous research has explored various factors influencing this effect, but the specific mechanisms underlying different components of the effect remain debated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To isolate specific stimulus factors contributing to the word-superiority effect.
  • To differentiate the factors responsible for the word-nonword advantage from those responsible for the word-letter advantage.
  • To investigate the relationship between word-superiority and word-detection effects.

Main Methods:

  • Experiments with unlimited viewing time were conducted.
  • Stimulus conditions varied, including type size, contrast, and the presence of masks.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Participants performed tasks involving word recognition, nonword recognition, and single-letter identification.
  • A word-detection task was also employed, requiring discrimination between letters and nonletters.

    • Main Results:

    • The advantage of words over nonwords was observed under various conditions (small type, low contrast, masking).
    • The advantage of words over single letters was contingent on stimuli being embedded in a mask, hindering single-letter identification.
    • A word-detection effect (words detected more accurately than nonwords) was found without brief exposure, but only when letter-nonletter discrimination was required.

    Conclusions:

    • The word-nonword effect and the word-letter effect are driven by different underlying factors.
    • Both the word-superiority effect (word-nonword difference) and the word-detection effect involve letter discrimination.
    • These effects can be explained by shared cognitive mechanisms related to letter processing within context.