Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Reliability and validity issues in phenomenological research

C T Beck1

  • 1College of Nursing, University of Rhode Island, Kingston.

Western Journal of Nursing Research
|June 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Risk factors for postpartum depression: the role of the Postpartum Depression Predictors Inventory-Revised (PDPI-R). Results from the Perinatal Depression-Research & Screening Unit (PNDReScU) study.

Archives of women's mental health·2009
Same author

Postpartum depression.

Journal of midwifery & women's health·2002
Same author

Ensuring content validity: an illustration of the process.

Journal of nursing measurement·2001
Same author

Predictors of postpartum depression: an update.

Nursing research·2001
Same author

Comparative analysis of the performance of the Postpartum Depression Screening Scale with two other depression instruments.

Nursing research·2001
Same author

Item response theory in affective instrument development: an illustration.

Journal of nursing measurement·2001
Same journal

The Relationship Between Cognitive Flexibility and Career Adaptability in Nursing Interns: The Mediating Role of Future Work Self-Salience.

Western journal of nursing research·2026
Same journal

Effects of Compassion Meditation on Psychological Status in Patients With Diabetes: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Western journal of nursing research·2026
Same journal

Experiences of Staff in the Transition of People Living With Dementia From Home to Long-term Care Facilities Based on Person-Centred Care: A Meta-synthesis.

Western journal of nursing research·2026
Same journal

Engaging With Hospital Staff to Develop Implementation Strategies For Delivering a Patient Falls Prevention Education Program Using a World Café.

Western journal of nursing research·2026
Same journal

The Quiet Power of Keywords.

Western journal of nursing research·2026
Same journal

The Role of eHealth Literacy in Internet Gaming Disorder and Help-Seeking Among College Students.

Western journal of nursing research·2026
See all related articles

This study clarifies reliability and validity in phenomenological research, highlighting differing interpretations between logical empiricism and phenomenology. It suggests alternative rigor criteria for qualitative inquiry, enhancing phenomenological research standards.

Area of Science:

  • Phenomenological research
  • Qualitative inquiry
  • Nursing research

Background:

  • Logical empiricism criteria are often applied to phenomenology, causing confusion.
  • The terms reliability and validity may have different meanings across research paradigms.
  • Lack of consensus exists on reliability and validity within phenomenological nursing research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To clarify the concepts of reliability and validity from a phenomenological perspective.
  • To compare and contrast phenomenological methodologies regarding reliability and validity.
  • To explore alternative criteria for rigor in qualitative inquiry.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of Colaizzi, Giorgi, and VanKaam's phenomenological methodologies.
  • Examination of Lincoln and Guba's criteria for qualitative rigor.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Contrast of logical empiricism and phenomenological viewpoints on research quality.

    • Main Results:

    • Significant differences in the interpretation of reliability and validity exist between logical empiricism and phenomenology.
    • Phenomenological methods show varying approaches to ensuring research rigor.
    • Lincoln and Guba's criteria offer a potential framework for phenomenological research quality.

    Conclusions:

    • Applying logical empiricism's criteria directly to phenomenology can be problematic.
    • Phenomenological research requires distinct approaches to reliability and validity.
    • Alternative rigor criteria, such as those proposed by Lincoln and Guba, may better suit phenomenological inquiry.