Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Liability and mental health services

S R Smith1

  • 1Cleveland-Marshall College of Law, Cleveland State University, Ohio.

The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry
|April 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Improving communication during damage control surgery: a survey of adult major trauma centres in England.

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2024
Same author

Aging human abdominal subcutaneous white adipose tissue at single cell resolution.

Aging cell·2024
Same author

Do contaminants compromise the use of recycled nutrients in organic agriculture? A review and synthesis of current knowledge on contaminant concentrations, fate in the environment and risk assessment.

The Science of the total environment·2023
Same author

Measurement of 24-h continuous human CH<sub>4</sub> release in a whole room indirect calorimeter.

Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)·2023
Same author

Nitrogen and Iron Availability Drive Metabolic Remodeling and Natural Selection of Diverse Phytoplankton during Experimental Upwelling.

mSystems·2022
Same author

Caloric restriction in humans reveals immunometabolic regulators of health span.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2022
Same journal

Mental health in asylum-seeking parents: Dynamics of fragmentation, resilience, and empowerment.

The American journal of orthopsychiatry·2026
Same journal

Exploring the role of schools during prolonged crisis: Lessons learned from an armed conflict in Israel.

The American journal of orthopsychiatry·2026
Same journal

Exploring the role of critical consciousness on complex trauma for adopted adults.

The American journal of orthopsychiatry·2026
Same journal

"When I saw his face, I recognized him": Visibility, complexity, and therapeutic negotiation of LGBTQ+ identity disclosure in social work practice.

The American journal of orthopsychiatry·2026
Same journal

Parenting and social support: Caregiver strain in social context for low-income Black mothers.

The American journal of orthopsychiatry·2026
Same journal

From involuntary dependence to resilient agency: First wartime responses and evacuation experiences of people with disabilities in Israel.

The American journal of orthopsychiatry·2026
See all related articles

Mental health malpractice claims harm providers and patients. Reform proposals like compensation panels or arbitration aim to improve privacy, reduce costs, and increase satisfaction in dispute resolution.

Area of Science:

  • Mental health law
  • Medical malpractice
  • Alternative dispute resolution

Background:

  • Current tort-malpractice litigation negatively impacts mental health professionals' reputations.
  • These legal processes can breach patient confidentiality and disrupt provider relationships.
  • Challenges exist in defining the standard of care and proving causation in mental health malpractice cases.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine common areas of mental health malpractice.
  • To analyze the difficulties in establishing the standard of care and causation.
  • To explore reform proposals for dispute resolution in mental health malpractice.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing tort-malpractice system concerning mental health claims.
  • Analysis of common malpractice areas and legal challenges.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of proposed reforms: interdisciplinary compensation panels and binding arbitration.

    • Main Results:

    • The current system presents significant challenges regarding reputation, confidentiality, and provider relationships.
    • Defining the standard of care and proving causation are identified as key difficulties.
    • Proposed reforms offer potential benefits for privacy, efficiency, and satisfaction.

    Conclusions:

    • The existing tort-malpractice system is inadequate for addressing mental health claims effectively.
    • Interdisciplinary compensation panels and binding arbitration present viable alternatives.
    • These reforms could enhance privacy, reduce litigation burdens, and improve dispute resolution outcomes.