Evaluation of parallel pelvic/breast and male genital/rectal teaching programs

Pelvic/breast (PB) and male genital/rectal (GR) programs were evaluated to learn if male and female students differed in their reactions to the programs and if observations of the programs confirmed students' reactions. In-depth interviews were conducted with male and female teaching associates to uncover the need for program improvements beyond those suggested by observation and student reactions. Participating in the PB program were 74 men and 85 women; 79 men and 90 women took part in the GR program. Sex differences were found in the GR program: Female students admitted to greater anxiety about examining male genitalia prior to the program (p = .009) and expressed more dissatisfaction with the timing (too late in the curriculum p = .006). Male students were less likely than females to improve their ability to communicate as a result of the GR program (p = .009). Observations and interviews indicated that the programs were successful in teaching technical skills but that they needed further work in integrating technical and communication training, especially during GR examination training.