Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Less attention and more perception in cued line bisection

M H Fischer1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst 01003.

Brain and Cognition
|May 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Coexisting Multiple Charge Orders and Magnetism in the Kagome Superconductor LaRu<sub>3</sub>Si<sub>2</sub>.

Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)·2025
Same author

Depth-dependent study of time-reversal symmetry-breaking in the kagome superconductor AV<sub>3</sub>Sb<sub>5</sub>.

Nature communications·2024
Same author

Spontaneous grip force fluctuations mirror semantic numerical magnitude processing: Larger numbers elicit larger forces.

Acta psychologica·2024
Same author

Magnon interactions in a moderately correlated Mott insulator.

Nature communications·2024
Same author

How to not induce SNAs: The insufficiency of directional force.

PloS one·2023
Same author

Spatial-numerical associations without a motor response? Grip force says 'Yes'.

Acta psychologica·2022

Line bisection bias arises from perceptual grouping, not attention. Cues closer to the line influenced bisection performance, suggesting visual perception, not attentional shifts, drives these effects.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Perception
  • Experimental Psychology

Background:

  • Line bisection tasks are used to study spatial attention and perception.
  • Previous research has debated whether biases in line bisection stem from attentional mechanisms or perceptual grouping.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether biases in cued line bisection are caused by perceptual grouping or attentional factors.
  • To differentiate between the roles of perception and attention in spatial bias.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted using a cued line bisection task.
  • Participants reported two lateralized letter cues before bisecting a line.
  • Cue spacing was varied (equally vs. asymmetrically spaced) relative to the line.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • No significant effect of the order of cue reporting on bisection performance was observed.
  • Line bisection was consistently biased towards the side with the closer-spaced cue.
  • Performance was not influenced by attentional factors, as evidenced by the lack of order effects.

Conclusions:

  • The findings suggest that biases in cued line bisection are primarily driven by perceptual grouping mechanisms.
  • Attentional factors do not appear to play a significant role in these observed cuing effects.
  • This study provides evidence for the perceptual basis of spatial biases in visual tasks.