Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 4, 2026

A High-throughput Assay for the Prediction of Chemical Toxicity by Automated Phenotypic Profiling of Caenorhabditis elegans
Published on: March 14, 2019
Quantitative prediction of drug toxicity in humans from toxicology in small and large animals
Abstract:
The mouse, dog, and monkey toxicity data on 30 drugs was retrospectively analyzed in comparison with the actual clinical dose schedules used in man. Animal dose schedules were converted to the human schedule and comparisons were made of the human dose versus the large animal toxic dose low, toxic dose high, and lethal dose, the lethal doses for 10% and 90% of normal mice, and the optimal dose in tumor-bearing mice. If the starting dose in Phase 1 clinical trials had been selected by calculating one-third of the toxic dose low (in mg/sq m) in the most sensitive large animal species, 5 of the 30 drugs would have produced significant toxicity in the first patient. The lethal doses for 10 and 90% of normal mice and the optimal dose in L1210-bearing mice were found to offer good quantitative prediction of human toxicity. Determination of a safe and practical starting dose for Phase 1 studies should take into account not only dog and monkey data but also toxicology data in normal and tumor-bearing mice.
Insights
Predicting human toxicity from animal data is crucial for safe drug development. Mouse toxicity data, particularly lethal doses and optimal tumor doses, offers a reliable method for determining safe starting doses in early-phase clinical trials.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacology
- Toxicology
- Preclinical Research
Background:
- Accurate prediction of human toxicity from animal models is essential for safe clinical drug development.
- Current methods for selecting starting doses in Phase 1 clinical trials may not sufficiently account for interspecies variability.
- Retrospective analysis of existing toxicity data can refine predictive models for human drug response.
Purpose of the Study:
- To retrospectively analyze mouse, dog, and monkey toxicity data for 30 drugs against human clinical dose schedules.
- To evaluate the predictive value of various animal toxicity metrics for human toxicity.
- To determine optimal strategies for selecting safe and effective starting doses for Phase 1 clinical trials.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of toxicity data from mouse, dog, and monkey studies for 30 drugs.
- Conversion of animal dose schedules to human-equivalent doses (mg/sq m).
- Comparison of human doses with animal toxic doses (low, high, lethal) and mouse lethal doses (LD10, LD90) and optimal tumor doses.
Main Results:
- Using one-third of the toxic low dose in the most sensitive large animal species could have led to significant toxicity in 5 out of 30 drugs in Phase 1 trials.
- Lethal doses for 10% and 90% of normal mice (LD10, LD90) and the optimal dose in L1210-bearing mice provided good quantitative prediction of human toxicity.
- Toxicology data from both normal and tumor-bearing mice, alongside dog and monkey data, is vital for safe starting dose determination.
Conclusions:
- Mouse toxicity data, including lethal doses and optimal tumor doses, are valuable predictors of human toxicity.
- Relying solely on large animal data (dog, monkey) may underestimate toxicity risks for certain drugs.
- A comprehensive approach incorporating diverse animal toxicology data is necessary for establishing safe and practical Phase 1 starting doses.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Drug Toxicity: Overview
Drug Toxicity: Risk factors
Drug Toxicity: Dose-Dependent Reactions
Drug toxicity: Drug–Drug Interaction
Toxicokinetics: Overview
Toxicity Testing in Animals

