Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Benchmarking applied to health care

R C Camp1, A G Tweet

  • 1Xerox Corporation, Rochester, NY 14644.

The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement
|May 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary

This study explores how benchmarking, a well-known business practice, can be adapted to health care settings. Benchmarking involves finding and implementing best practices from other organizations. The authors describe four types of benchmarking and use a fictional case study to illustrate how these methods can improve medical processes like biopsies. They emphasize that benchmarking is a structured and organized approach that can help health care organizations achieve worthwhile goals. The study suggests that benchmarking can be applied to clinical, business, and support functions, with a particular focus on how best practices can be identified and implemented.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Benchmarking--a conversation with Robert C. Camp. The source. Interview by Joe Flower.

The Healthcare Forum journal·1992
Same author

Learning from the best leads to superior performance.

The Journal of business strategy·1992
Same author

Capital strategies combat the removal of PIP.

Healthcare financial management : journal of the Healthcare Financial Management Association·1987
Same author

The effect of nerve growth factor and antibodies to nerve growth factor on ethylnitrosourea-induced neoplastic proliferation in rat trigeminal nerves.

Veterinary pathology·1984
Same author

Effect of somatostatin infusion on jejunal water and electrolyte transport in a patient with secretory diarrhea due to malignant carcinoid syndrome.

Gastroenterology·1980
Same author

Gastrin content of columnar mucosal lining the lower (Barrett's) esophagus.

The American journal of digestive diseases·1977

Area of Science:

  • Health care management
  • Business process optimization in medicine
  • Operational research in clinical settings

Background:

Health care systems face complex challenges in improving efficiency and quality. Prior research has shown that benchmarking is a well-established practice in business and industry. However, its application in health care remains limited. It was already known that benchmarking can identify best practices across organizations. No prior work had resolved how to adapt this approach to clinical and business functions in health care. This gap motivated researchers to explore how benchmarking could be applied in medical settings. The lack of structured guidance for health care benchmarking remains a key issue. That uncertainty drove the development of a framework tailored to medical environments.

Purpose Of The Study:

The study aimed to define and illustrate how benchmarking could be applied in health care. It focused on adapting the Xerox model to medical settings. The goal was to show how best practices could be identified and implemented. The researchers proposed that benchmarking could improve clinical and business functions. They wanted to demonstrate how different types of benchmarking could be used. The study also sought to address the challenges of applying benchmarking in health care. The authors suggested that structured benchmarking could help organizations achieve worthwhile goals. Their approach aimed to provide a clear framework for health care improvement.

Keywords:
health care benchmarkingXerox modelclinical process improvementbusiness function optimization

Frequently Asked Questions

Benchmarking is defined as 'finding and implementing best practices.'

The four types are internal, competitive, functional, and generic process benchmarking.

Support functions can provide the greatest competitive edge in a business sense.

The model is a structured framework for pursuing worthwhile goals in an organized way.

Clinical functions include outpatient and inpatient procedures like biopsies.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

The authors used the Xerox benchmarking model as a foundation. They described four types of benchmarking: internal, competitive, functional, and generic process. Each type was explained with examples relevant to health care. The model was illustrated through a fictional case study involving biopsy processes. The case study focused on outpatient and inpatient procedures. The authors outlined ten steps in the benchmarking process. They emphasized the importance of identifying best practices and implementing them. The method involved comparing performance measures to those of leading organizations.

Main Results:

The study showed that benchmarking can be adapted to health care settings. The Xerox model was successfully applied to a fictional medical case. The ten-step process was used to improve biopsy-related work processes. The results suggested that benchmarking can target business, support, and clinical functions. The authors proposed that clinical benchmarking can leverage existing networks. They found that support functions often provide the greatest competitive edge. The case study demonstrated how performance measures could be surpassed. The model suggested that benchmarking is a structured and organized approach.

Conclusions:

The authors concluded that benchmarking is a useful tool in health care. They proposed that it can help organizations pursue worthwhile goals. The study suggested that benchmarking can be applied to various functions. The Xerox model was shown to be adaptable to medical settings. The authors emphasized the importance of structured frameworks. They suggested that benchmarking can improve both clinical and business processes. The case study illustrated how best practices can be implemented. The findings indicated that benchmarking is a non-complicated process.

Benchmarking can help organizations implement best practices and improve performance.