Related Experiment Videos
Centralised treatment, entry to trials and survival
1University of Oxford, Department of Paediatrics, UK.
British Journal of Cancer
|August 1, 1994
Summary
Centralized cancer care at specialist centers or within clinical trials is linked to better survival rates, especially for rare cancers. This review highlights the need for further research into optimal cancer care organization.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Health Services Research
- Public Health
Background:
- Cancer survival rates are influenced by healthcare organization.
- Treatment at specialist centers and adherence to clinical protocols are key areas of interest.
- Existing literature suggests potential benefits of centralized care models.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review published literature on cancer survival rates.
- To examine the relationship between survival and healthcare organization patterns, including specialist centers and clinical trials.
- To identify gaps in current research regarding optimal cancer care delivery.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of published studies on cancer survival.
- Analysis of studies focusing on treatment at specialist centers versus general hospitals.
- Examination of studies evaluating treatment by protocol within clinical trials.
Main Results:
- Centralized referral or trial entry was frequently associated with higher cancer survival rates.
- This association was particularly noted for less common cancer types.
- No studies indicated a lower survival rate associated with centralized care models.
Conclusions:
- Centralized cancer care models appear beneficial for patient survival.
- Further research is needed to define the most effective patterns of cancer care organization.
- Population-based cancer registries are crucial resources for future research in the UK health service.