Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

An internal dosimetry intercomparison study

T E Hui1, R M Loesch, C Raddatz

  • 1Health Physics Department, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352.

Health Physics
|September 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The impact of a walnut-rich breakfast on cognitive performance and brain activity throughout the day in healthy young adults: a crossover intervention trial.

Food & function·2025
Same author

ICRP Publication 140: Radiological Protection in Therapy with Radiopharmaceuticals.

Annals of the ICRP·2019
Same author

Dopamine and Abeta-induced stress signaling and decrements in Ca2+ buffering in primary neonatal hippocampal cells are antagonized by blueberry extract.

Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD·2007
Same author

Dopamine-induced stress signaling in COS-7 cells transfected with selectively vulnerable muscarinic receptor subtypes is partially mediated via the i3 loop and antagonized by blueberry extract.

Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD·2006
Same author

Blueberry extract alters oxidative stress-mediated signaling in COS-7 cells transfected with selectively vulnerable muscarinic receptor subtypes.

Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD·2006
Same author

Assessments for high dose radionuclide therapy treatment planning.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2003
Same journal

Assessment of Health Risks of Adults and Children Due to Consumption of Uranium in Groundwater from Chengalpattu District, Tamil Nadu, India.

Health physics·2026
Same journal

Radiation Protection Abstracts, Volume 46, Number 1.

Health physics·2026
Same journal

Specialized Radiological Assets for Navigable Two-dimensional and Three-dimensional Virtual and Augmented Reality.

Health physics·2026
Same journal

DoseBusters: A Fully Immersive Virtual Reality Game for Radiation Protection and Detection.

Health physics·2026
Same journal

Radioactivity in Bottled Drinking Water from Greater Dhaka City and Concomitant Ingestion Doses to Consumers.

Health physics·2026
Same journal

Assessment of Radiation Dose and Protection Practices in Neonatal Radiography in NICUs.

Health physics·2026
See all related articles

This study assessed internal dosimetry assessment consistency across eleven labs using real exposure scenarios. Results showed significant variability (30-50% standard deviation), highlighting needs for improved bioassay data interpretation and modeling.

Area of Science:

  • Occupational health
  • Radiation protection
  • Dosimetry

Background:

  • Internal dosimetry assessments are crucial for radiation protection.
  • Consistency in these assessments across different laboratories is vital for reliable dose evaluation.
  • Previous studies, including a European intercomparison, have indicated variability in results.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the consistency of internal dosimetry assessments performed by multiple laboratories.
  • To compare the variability of dose assessments in the US context with previous European findings.
  • To identify key factors contributing to discrepancies in internal dose calculations.

Main Methods:

  • Eleven laboratories (DOE sites and NRC licensees) participated.
  • Participants analyzed five standardized exposure scenarios with provided bioassay data.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Calculations included estimated radionuclide intake and resulting internal doses, specifically committed effective dose equivalent.

    • Main Results:

    • A standard deviation of 30-50% of the mean committed effective dose equivalent was observed across most scenarios.
    • This indicates a slightly greater variability compared to a similar European study.
    • One scenario showed a notably different outcome, suggesting potential scenario-specific issues.

    Conclusions:

    • Discrepancies in internal dosimetry assessments stem from variations in bioassay data interpretation, statistical treatment, biokinetic models, and computational tools.
    • The study highlights a need for further intercomparison testing to fully address dose-assessment inconsistencies.
    • Standardization of methods and models is recommended to improve the reliability of internal dose assessments.