Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
Published on: October 23, 2020
Feasibility, reliability and women's views of a risk scoring system for cervical neoplasia in primary care
C E Wilkinson1, T J Peters, I M Harvey
1Department of General Practice, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff.
Background:
A risk assessment scale for cervical neoplasia has been developed which gives a risk score based on four factors: level of education, current smoking status, number of years of oral contraceptive use and number of sexual partners ever.
Aim:
A pilot study was undertaken to determine the feasibility and acceptability of a self-report data form, used to assess risk of cervical neoplasia, and the test-retest reliability of women's responses to the questions.
Method:
A sample of women attending one general practice were asked to complete a self-report data form which included some highly personal questions, and a questionnaire assessing their level of difficulty and discomfort completing the form. Women were sent a second self-report data form four weeks later in order to assess test-retest reliability.
Results:
There was a high level of cooperation with the study (94% initial participation rate), little evidence of discomfort with the questions posed, and high test-retest reliability.
Conclusion:
The results of this pilot study have positive implications for a large prospective study evaluating the predictive power of the risk scale in relation to the result of the cervical smear test.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT

