Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Coherence in observational studies

P R Rosenbaum1

  • 1Department of Statistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104-6302.

Biometrics
|June 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Quantifying causal inference requires assessing treatment-outcome associations. This study develops a statistical test for coherent associations and examines its sensitivity to hidden bias, suggesting improved causal judgment.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Matching One Sample According to Two Criteria in Observational Studies.

Journal of the American Statistical Association·2023
Same author

Development of a measure of family-centred care for resource-poor South African settings: the experience of using a modified version of the MPOC-20.

Child: care, health and development·2008
Same author

Matching and thick description in an observational study of mortality after surgery.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2003
Same author

Multivariate matching and bias reduction in the surgical outcomes study.

Medical care·2001
Same author

Reduced sensitivity to hidden bias at upper quantiles in observational studies with dilated treatment effects.

Biometrics·2001
Same author

Substantial gains in bias reduction from matching with a variable number of controls.

Biometrics·2000
Same journal

Fast penalized generalized estimating equations for large longitudinal functional datasets.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Causally-interpretable random-effects meta-analysis.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Statistical inference for mean function of partially observed functional time series.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Subgroup identification via Interaction Tree and Mixed Model for Repeated Measures with application to Alzheimer's disease.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Finite mixtures of linear quantile regressions with concomitant variables: a solution to endogeneity in longitudinal data modeling.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Discussion on "INTACT: a method for integration of longitudinal physical activity data from multiple sources" by Jingru Zhang, Erjia Cui, Hongzhe Li, and Haochang Shou.

Biometrics·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology
  • Causal Inference

Background:

  • Assessing causality in treatment-outcome relationships is crucial.
  • Coherence of associations is often considered a key indicator of causality.
  • Quantifying the evidence from coherent associations remains a challenge.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a statistical method for quantifying evidence from coherent treatment-outcome associations.
  • To evaluate the sensitivity of this method to hidden biases.
  • To determine if coherent patterns reduce sensitivity to unmeasured confounding.

Main Methods:

  • A novel statistical test was developed, generalizing existing non-parametric tests (Mann-Whitney, Wilcoxon, Gehan).
  • The test detects and quantifies the coherence of associations between treatments and outcomes.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the impact of potential hidden biases.

    • Main Results:

    • A statistical test for coherent associations was successfully developed.
    • The study examined the test's robustness against hidden biases.
    • Findings suggest that coherent association patterns may offer greater resistance to hidden biases.

    Conclusions:

    • A new method quantifies evidence from coherent treatment-outcome associations.
    • Coherent associations demonstrate reduced sensitivity to hidden biases.
    • This approach enhances causal inference in observational studies.