Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The interpretation of multiplicative-model parameters as standardized parameters

S Greenland1, G Maldonado

  • 1Department of Epidemiology, UCLA School of Public Health 90024-1772.

Statistics in Medicine
|May 30, 1994
PubMed
Summary

Standard relative-risk estimates may inaccurately assume homogeneous effects. This study proposes interpreting them as standardized relative risks, accounting for model misspecification for more accurate results in epidemiological research.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bone Mass Loss and Sarcopenia in Ecuadorian Patients.

Journal of aging research·2020
Same author

Clinical Characteristics in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Differences between Genders.

TheScientificWorldJournal·2019
Same author

Duodenal membranes: a late diagnosis evidenced by foreign bodies.

Oxford medical case reports·2018
Same author

Angular momentum regulation strategies for highly dynamic landing in Parkour.

Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering·2017
Same author

Two glutathione transferase isoforms isolated from juvenile cysts of Taenia crassiceps: identification, purification and characterization.

Journal of helminthology·2017
Same author

Determination of Vitamin D Status in a Population of Ecuadorian Subjects.

TheScientificWorldJournal·2017

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Statistical Modeling

Background:

  • Current epidemiological practices often interpret relative-risk estimates from multiplicative models as homogeneous effects.
  • This interpretation relies on an unverifiable assumption of homogeneity, which may be incorrect even with good model fit.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a novel interpretation of relative-risk estimates as standardized relative risks.
  • To introduce a bias component dependent on model misspecification and study design.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of maximum-likelihood estimators from Poisson and logistic regression.
  • Evaluation against the population-standardized rate ratio.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • The proposed interpretation offers a more cautious approach to relative-risk estimation.
  • Standardized relative risk estimates demonstrate greater accuracy compared to homogeneous-effect interpretations.

    • Conclusions:

    • Relative-risk estimates are better understood as standardized risks with a bias component.
    • This approach enhances the accuracy and caution in interpreting epidemiological study findings.