Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Occupational cancer

M C Patellos¹, D H Garabrant

¹Department of Environmental and Industrial Health, University of Michigan, School of Public Health, Ann Arbor.

|June 1, 1994

Summary

Occupational cancer, linked to workplace exposures, requires a systematic diagnostic approach. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) monographs offer crucial evidence for evaluating cancer risks in working populations.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

The effects of occupational exposure to chlorpyrifos on the peripheral nervous system: a prospective cohort study.

Occupational and environmental medicine·2004

Same author

Potential risk factors for undifferentiated connective tissue disease among women: implanted medical devices.

American journal of epidemiology·2001

Same author

Serum dioxin and peripheral neuropathy in veterans of Operation Ranch Hand.

Neurotoxicology·2001

Same author

Evaluation of blink reflex results obtained from workers previously diagnosed with solvent-induced toxic encephalopathy.

Journal of occupational and environmental medicine·2001

Same author

Incidence of latex sensitization.

American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine·2001

Same author

Familial risk of pancreatic cancer.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute·2001

Area of Science:

Environmental Health
Occupational Medicine
Epidemiology

Background:

Occupational exposures significantly contribute to the overall cancer burden in the United States.
Histologic features alone cannot differentiate occupational cancer from cancers caused by other factors.
The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) evaluates agents linked to human cancer.

Purpose of the Study:

To outline a systematic framework for diagnosing occupational cancer.
To discuss the role of IARC monographs in assessing cancer risks for working populations.
To address the challenges and considerations for cancer screening and cluster investigations in occupational settings.

Main Methods:

Utilizing the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) monographs as a reference for evidence strength.
Implementing a systematic diagnostic process: confirming cancer, defining/quantifying exposures, and evaluating scientific evidence.
Applying rigorous scientific methodology to investigate cancer clusters, including case ascertainment and risk assessment.

Main Results:

IARC monographs provide reliable evidence on approximately 732 agents evaluated for carcinogenicity.
A confirmed cancer diagnosis, defined exposures, and evaluated scientific evidence are essential for occupational cancer diagnosis.
Cancer screening in workplaces is often difficult to justify scientifically and requires careful adaptation.

Conclusions:

Diagnosing occupational cancer necessitates a multi-faceted approach combining clinical confirmation, exposure assessment, and evidence evaluation.
IARC monographs are invaluable resources for practitioners addressing occupational cancer concerns.
Investigating occupational cancer clusters and implementing workplace screening require scientific rigor and careful consideration of legal and practical factors.

Related Experiment Videos