Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Height as a basis for interpersonal attraction

W E Hensley1

  • 1Department of Communication Studies, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg 24061-0311.

Adolescence
|January 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The measurement of height.

Adolescence·1998
Same author

Height and occupational success: a review and critique.

Psychological reports·1987
Same author

Message valence, familiarity, sex, and personality effects on the perceptual distortion of height.

The Journal of psychology·1980
Same author

Differences between males and females on Rosenburg scale of self-esteem.

Psychological reports·1977
Same author

Probability, personality, age, and risk taking.

The Journal of psychology·1977
Same author

Dimensions of Rosenburg's self-esteem scale.

Psychological reports·1976
Same journal

New expressions of racism among young people in Spain: an adaptation of the Meertens and Pettigrew (1992) prejudice scale.

Adolescence·2010
Same journal

Peer influence on adolescent boys' appearance management behaviors.

Adolescence·2010
Same journal

Physical activity levels and patterns of 11-14 year-old Turkish adolescents.

Adolescence·2010
Same journal

The effects of parental monitoring and leisure boredom on adolescents' Internet addiction.

Adolescence·2010
Same journal

Academic correlates of Taiwanese senior high school students' happiness.

Adolescence·2010
Same journal

American Indian youths' perceptions of their environment and their reports of depressive symptoms and alcohol/marijuana use.

Adolescence·2010
See all related articles

Men"s height provides a dating advantage, especially up to six feet, while women"s height has no impact. Actual dating choices follow a step function, not a complementary one, in partner selection.

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Human Mating Behavior

Background:

  • The male-taller norm in heterosexual relationships is a widely observed phenomenon.
  • Previous research has explored height preferences in partner selection, but the precise mechanisms and gendered outcomes require further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether dating partner selection follows a complementary or step function regarding height.
  • To examine the dating market advantages and disadvantages associated with height for both men and women.
  • To identify potential "ceiling effects" in the height advantage for males.

Main Methods:

  • Survey data collected from 594 college students on their dating partner selection criteria.
  • Analysis of hypothetical versus actual partner selection regarding height standards.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Statistical examination of height-related dating outcomes for males and females.
  • Main Results:

    • Actual dating partner selection is more indicative of a step function than a complementary function.
    • Males experience a significant dating advantage associated with greater height.
    • Females do not appear to face height-related disadvantages in the dating market.
    • A "ceiling effect" was observed, where the height advantage for males diminishes beyond six feet.

    Conclusions:

    • Height plays a distinct role in heterosexual dating, favoring taller males up to a certain threshold.
    • The decision-making process in dating partner selection, concerning height, is better described by a step function.
    • These findings contribute to understanding the nuances of height in mate selection and evolutionary psychology.