Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Background mortality in clinical survival studies

H A Verheul1, E Dekker, P Bossuyt

  • 1Department of Cardiology, Academical Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Lancet (London, England)
|April 3, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A rare twist in the abdomen: diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to omental infarction - a case report and literature review.

Acta gastro-enterologica Belgica·2026
Same author

Real-world Effectiveness and Safety of Tofacitinib in Multi-Refractory Ulcerative Colitis: insights from a Belgian Cohort with prior Anti-TNF and Vedolizumab Exposure.

Acta gastro-enterologica Belgica·2025
Same author

Risk of colorectal cancer and participation in fecal immunochemical test-based screening.

Public health·2025
Same author

Mental Health in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis: A Systematic Review.

Psycho-oncology·2025
Same author

Comparative Efficacy of Subcutaneous and Intravenous Infliximab and Vedolizumab for Maintenance Treatment of TNF-naive Adult Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Digestive diseases and sciences·2024
Same author

Quality outcome measures project in IBD: a proof-of-concept benchmarking study in three Belgian IBD units.

Acta gastro-enterologica Belgica·2024
Same journal

Assisted dying and the silencing of medicine's next generation.

Lancet (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Linguistic pragmatism: a woman with progressive abdominal pain in Thailand.

Lancet (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Medical compartmentalisation: a patient with chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome in Japan.

Lancet (London, England)·2026
Same journal

[<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-edotreotide versus everolimus for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (COMPETE): a phase 3, multicentre, randomised, open-label, superiority trial.

Lancet (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Research priorities for characterising Bundibugyo virus.

Lancet (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Rethinking treatment sequence in advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours.

Lancet (London, England)·2026
See all related articles

Traditional survival analysis for elderly patients can be biased. Rate adjustment of background mortality improves accuracy by matching general population rates to patient demographics over time.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Medical Statistics
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Long-term survival studies, particularly in elderly populations, face challenges with extraneous mortality obscuring results.
  • The traditional method of calculating expected mortality using a static, matched cohort can introduce significant bias, especially when patient observation duration correlates with age.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and illustrate a rate adjustment method for calculating background mortality in long-term survival studies.
  • To provide a more accurate framework for assessing long-term survival, particularly in elderly patients.

Main Methods:

  • The study proposes an improved approach using rate adjustment, where general population mortality rates are weighted to match the age, sex, and calendar year of the observed patient cohort dynamically.

Related Experiment Videos

  • This method contrasts with the traditional static cohort approach.

    • Main Results:

    • Rate adjustment corrects for biases introduced by the static cohort method, especially when patient age and observation duration are correlated.
    • The method was illustrated with both a simplified example and a real-world case study of survival after aortic valve replacement.

    Conclusions:

    • Rate-adjusted background mortality estimation offers a more accurate perspective on long-term survival, significantly benefiting studies involving elderly patients.
    • This refined statistical approach is crucial for reliable survival analysis in clinical research.