Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026

Measurement of Lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster
Published on: January 7, 2013
Cause-specific mortality: understanding uncertain tips of the disease iceberg
1Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Oxford.
Insights
This study reveals varying accuracy in certifying diseases on death certificates. Some conditions are consistently recorded, while others, like diabetes and fractured neck of femur, are often underreported as causes of death.
Area of Science:
- Medical Informatics
- Epidemiology
- Public Health
Background:
- Accurate cause-of-death certification is crucial for mortality statistics and public health.
- Understanding discrepancies between disease presence and death certificate recording is vital for data interpretation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the extent to which diseases present shortly before death are accurately certified as causes of death on death certificates.
- To identify patterns in disease certification practices.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study using linked hospital records and death certificates.
- Analysis of data from six districts in the Oxford Regional Health Authority area.
- Examined certification of diseases within four weeks and one year of hospital admission.
Main Results:
- Three certification patterns emerged: diseases consistently recorded (e.g., lung cancer, myocardial infarction), diseases often recorded but not as underlying cause (e.g., tuberculosis, diabetes mellitus), and diseases rarely recorded (e.g., fractured neck of femur, asthma).
- Certification practices showed convergence towards common cardiovascular and respiratory causes.
- Evidence suggests potentially avoidable causes of death may be undercertified.
Conclusions:
- Knowledge of disease-specific certification patterns is essential when interpreting mortality statistics.
- Linking morbidity and mortality records, alongside multiple cause analysis, can improve mortality quantification.
Study Objective:
To determine the extent to which individual diseases, when recorded as being present shortly before death, were certified as causes of death.
Design:
Retrospective cohort study in which the "subjects" were computerised linked records.
Setting:
Six districts in the Oxford Regional Health Authority area (covering a population of 1.9 million people).
Subjects:
Linked abstracts of hospital records and death certificates for people who died within four weeks and, for some diseases, within one year of hospital admission.
Main Outcome Measures:
The percentage of people with each disease for whom the disease was recorded as the underlying cause of death, was recorded elsewhere on the death certificate, or was not certified as a cause of death at all.
Results:
Three broad patterns of certification are distinguished. Firstly, there were diseases that were usually recorded on death certificates when death occurred within four weeks of hospital care of them. Examples included lung cancer (on 91% of such death certificates), breast cancer (92%), leukaemia and lymphoma (90%), anterior horn cell disease (89%), multiple sclerosis (89%), myocardial infarction (90%), stroke (93%), aortic aneurysm (87%), and spina bifida (89%). These diseases were also usually certified as the underlying cause of death. Secondly, there were diseases which, when present within four weeks of death, were commonly recorded on death certificates but often not as the underlying cause of death. Examples included tuberculosis (on 76% of such certificates; underlying cause on 54%), thyroid disease (49%; 21%), diabetes mellitus (69%; 30%) and hypertension (43%; 22%). Thirdly, there were conditions which, when death occurred within four weeks of their treatment, were recorded on the death certificate in a minority of cases only. Examples of these included fractured neck of femur (on 25% of such certificates), asthma (37%), and anaemia (22%). Not surprisingly, there was "convergence" in certification practice towards the common cardiovascular and respiratory causes of death. There was also evidence that conditions regarded as avoidable causes of death may not have been certified when present at death in some patients.
Conclusion:
When uses are made of mortality statistics alone, it is important to know which category of certification practice the disease of interest is likely to be in. Linkage between morbidity and mortality records, and multiple cause analysis of mortality, would considerably improve the ability to quantify mortality associated with individual diseases.
Related Concept Videos
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Cancer Survival Analysis

