Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Visual attention and objects: one versus two or convex versus concave?

B S Gibson1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218-2686.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|February 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Diagnosis of anthracycline-induced late cardiomyopathy by exercise-spiroergometry and stress-echocardiography.

European journal of pediatrics·2001
Same author

Visual marking and the perception of salience in visual search.

Perception & psychophysics·2001
Same author

Searching for one versus two identical targets: when visual search has a memory.

Psychological science·2001
Same author

Inhibition of return and attentional control settings.

Perception & psychophysics·2000
Same author

Stimulus-driven attentional capture is contingent on attentional set for displaywide visual features.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·1998
Same author

Visual quality and attentional capture: a challenge to the special role of abrupt onsets.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·1996
Same journal

Human thermal sensitivity drifts at extreme temperatures.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Dynamic competition between selective attention and spatial prediction during visual search.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Encapsulation of the visual perception of social events from semantic priming.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Biasmapping: Idiosyncratic covert search in the vicinity of fixation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

What are you still waiting for? Fricative recognition shows encapsulated processing and is partially predicted by secondary cue reliance.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Eye movements reveal that drivers can predict the location of hazards in dynamic road scenes but gaze and awareness are dissociable.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
See all related articles

Visual attention is more efficient within a single object than between multiple objects. This study confirms that contour convexity, not object count, influences attention efficiency in spatial tasks.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Object-based theories suggest attention is more efficient within a single object.
  • Baylis and Driver (1993) proposed a hierarchical coding of location hypothesis to explain this single-object advantage.
  • Previous research indicated faster location comparison for vertices within a single (convex) object versus separate (concave) objects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To replicate the finding of a single-object advantage in visual attention.
  • To investigate whether contour convexity or object number primarily affects spatial attention efficiency.
  • To test the hierarchical coding of location hypothesis.

Main Methods:

  • Replication of Baylis and Driver's (1993) experiment comparing vertex location comparison latency.
  • Experimental manipulation of object contour convexity (convex vs. concave).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Experimental manipulation of the number of objects presented.

    • Main Results:

    • The study successfully replicated the finding that location comparison is faster for vertices within a single object.
    • Latency was significantly affected by the convexity of the contour.
    • The number of objects did not significantly affect location comparison latency.

    Conclusions:

    • The single-object advantage in spatial attention is primarily driven by contour convexity, not the mere number of objects.
    • Findings support the hierarchical coding of location hypothesis, emphasizing the role of object structure in visual attention.
    • This research refines our understanding of how spatial organization influences attentional processing.