Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Reducing retroactive interference: an interference analysis

G H Bower1, S Thompson-Schill, E Tulving

  • 1Department of Psychology, Stanford University, California 94305.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|January 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

National Hospital for the Paralysed and Epileptic.

The Hospital·2018
Same author

PET studies of encoding and retrieval: The HERA model.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same author

Recognition failure of words with a single meaning.

Memory & cognition·2013
Same author

Novelty assessment in the brain and long-term memory encoding.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same author

The role of repetition and associative interference in new semantic learning in amnesia: a case experiment.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same author

Functional Neuroanatomy of Recall and Recognition: A PET Study of Episodic Memory.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same journal

Testing the predictions of a distinctiveness model of memory: The production effect in backward recall.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

On the impact of adjacency on transposed-word effects under serial presentation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It's time to opt out: Metacognitive analysis of time regulation under uncertainty.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

The role of statistical learning in attentional guidance during search through naturalistic scenes.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Representing objects and features in long-term memory: A case for direct feature-feature binding.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Crossmodal correspondences influence adaptation during rule-based category learning of objects.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
See all related articles

Predictive relationships in learning significantly impact memory recall. When stimulus categories predict unique response categories, retroactive interference (RI) and forgetting are minimal, aiding rapid learning.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Memory Research

Background:

  • Retroactive interference (RI) is a key phenomenon in memory research.
  • Understanding factors that influence forgetting is crucial for memory models.
  • Paired-associate learning provides a paradigm to study interference effects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how predictive relationships between stimulus and response categories affect learning and RI.
  • To determine the conditions under which forgetting in RI paradigms is negligible or appreciable.
  • To examine the role of response uniqueness in mitigating interference.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted four experiments using paired-associate learning tasks.
  • Manipulated the predictive relationship between stimulus and response word categories.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Varied the uniqueness of response words within their categories.
  • Measured learning speed and the degree of retroactive interference (forgetting).

    • Main Results:

    • Learning was rapid and RI was negligible when stimulus categories accurately predicted unique response categories.
    • Slower learning and greater RI occurred when more competing items were present within the predicted response category.
    • Learning was slow and RI was appreciable when stimulus and response categories were unrelated.

    Conclusions:

    • Predictive category relations significantly alter forgetting in RI paradigms.
    • Stimulus-category-driven retrieval of unique responses minimizes interference.
    • The structure of learning materials critically influences memory performance and susceptibility to interference.