Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Absolute sensitivity measured psychophysically and using auditory steady-state potentials

C A Champlin1, J O'Neal

  • 1Department of Speech Communication, University of Texas at Austin.

Scandinavian Audiology
|January 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Single-shot structural analysis by high-energy X-ray diffraction using an ultrashort all-optical source.

Scientific reports·2017
Same author

A Survey of Audiological Practices in the United States.

American journal of audiology·2015
Same author

Clinical development of cancer therapeutics that target metabolism.

QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians·2015
Same author

6-Phosphofructo-2-kinase (PFKFB3) promotes cell cycle progression and suppresses apoptosis via Cdk1-mediated phosphorylation of p27.

Cell death & disease·2014
Same author

What an osteopathic lesion means to me.

Year book. Academy of Applied Osteopathy·2010
Same author

Comfort level and delegation: a proposal.

The Oklahoma nurse·2002
Same journal

Vision and hearing in old age.

Scandinavian audiology·2002
Same journal

Two families with phenotypically different hereditary low frequency hearing impairment: longitudinal data and linkage analysis.

Scandinavian audiology·2002
Same journal

Age and noise-induced hearing loss.

Scandinavian audiology·2002
Same journal

Bilateral hearing aids--effects and consequences from a user perspective.

Scandinavian audiology·2002
Same journal

Threshold-based fitting methods for non-linear (WDRC) hearing instruments--comparison of acoustic characteristics.

Scandinavian audiology·2002
Same journal

Will hearing healthcare be affordable in the new millennium.

Scandinavian audiology·2001
See all related articles

This study compared behavioral and physiological hearing thresholds. As sounds became more frequency-specific, behavioral thresholds improved while physiological thresholds worsened, increasing the gap between them.

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Neurophysiology

Background:

  • Understanding auditory thresholds is crucial for diagnosing hearing impairments.
  • Comparing psychophysical (behavioral) and physiological (electrophysiological) measures provides complementary insights into auditory processing.
  • Frequency specificity plays a significant role in auditory perception and neural response.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To measure and compare absolute hearing thresholds using both psychophysical and physiological methods in the same subjects.
  • To investigate the influence of frequency specificity on these auditory thresholds.
  • To examine the relationship between psychophysical and physiological thresholds across different frequencies and stimulus types.

Main Methods:

  • Absolute hearing thresholds were determined using a modified method of limits for psychophysical measurements.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Auditory steady-state potentials were recorded from the scalp for physiological threshold measurements.
  • Stimuli included click trains, periodic tone bursts, and amplitude-modulated tones at center frequencies of 480 Hz and 2000 Hz.

    • Main Results:

    • Psychophysical thresholds improved with increased frequency specificity, while physiological thresholds worsened.
    • The difference between psychophysical and physiological thresholds increased monotonically with frequency specificity.
    • Physiological thresholds were lower for low-frequency stimuli compared to high-frequency stimuli, whereas psychophysical thresholds were similar across frequencies.

    Conclusions:

    • Frequency specificity differentially affects behavioral and physiological measures of auditory thresholds.
    • The observed divergence highlights distinct neural mechanisms underlying psychophysical perception and physiological responses.
    • These findings have implications for understanding auditory processing and developing more accurate hearing assessment techniques.