Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Generalizing from clinical trials

C E Davis1

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina, School of Public Health, Chapel Hill 27599-7400.

Controlled Clinical Trials
|February 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Impact of COVID-19 on surgical training.

The British journal of surgery·2021
Same author

Evaluation of a Sound Velocity Analyzer for Estimating Maximum Internal Temperature to Which Meat Products Have Been Heat Processed.

Journal of food protection·2019
Same author

Pyruvate Kinase Activity as an Indicator of Temperature Attained During Cooking of Cured Pork.

Journal of food protection·2017
Same author

Genomic Analyses of Dominant U.S. Clonal Lineages of Phytophthora infestans Reveals a Shared Common Ancestry for Clonal Lineages US11 and US18 and a Lack of Recently Shared Ancestry Among All Other U.S. Lineages.

Phytopathology·2016
Same author

Review on ion mobility spectrometry. Part 1: current instrumentation.

The Analyst·2014
Same author

Review on ion mobility spectrometry. Part 2: hyphenated methods and effects of experimental parameters.

The Analyst·2014
Same journal

On the generation and ownership of alpha in medical studies.

Controlled clinical trials·2004
Same journal

An analysis of the effect of funding source in randomized clinical trials of second generation antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia.

Controlled clinical trials·2004
Same journal

Symptom recording in a randomised clinical trial: paper diaries vs. electronic or telephone data capture.

Controlled clinical trials·2004
Same journal

Statistical comparison of random allocation methods in cancer clinical trials.

Controlled clinical trials·2004
Same journal

Analyzing bronchodilation with emphasis on disease type, age and sex.

Controlled clinical trials·2004
Same journal

Geographic variability in patient characteristics, treatment and outcome in an International Trial of Magnesium in acute myocardial infarction.

Controlled clinical trials·2004
See all related articles

Generalizing clinical trial results requires integrating data from diverse sources, including basic science, animal, genetic, and observational studies. This approach ensures broader applicability of treatment findings beyond trial participants.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical research methodology
  • Evidence-based medicine
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the benchmark for treatment evaluation.
  • Participation in RCTs is limited to a small fraction of the patient population.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the extent to which findings from specific clinical trials can be generalized to the wider population.
  • To identify necessary information for valid extrapolation of clinical trial results.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature and methodologies for evidence synthesis.
  • Analysis of data sources beyond RCTs, including basic science, animal, genetic, observational, and epidemiological studies.
  • Case study illustrating generalization in cholesterol reduction treatments.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Generalization requires a multi-faceted evidence base.
  • Information from basic science, animal, genetic, observational, and epidemiological studies is crucial.
  • Comparison with other RCTs in similar contexts aids extrapolation.

Conclusions:

  • Extrapolation of clinical trial findings is feasible but requires careful consideration of diverse data.
  • A comprehensive approach integrating multiple evidence types enhances the generalizability of treatment efficacy.
  • The presented framework supports evidence-based decision-making for broader patient populations.