Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

User-definable bull's-eye database analysis

J L Lear1, J P Pratt, J Mallet

  • 1Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver 80262.

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine
|February 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Towards optimal use of antithrombotic therapy of people with cancer at the end of life: A research protocol for the development and implementation of the SERENITY shared decision support tool.

Thrombosis research·2023
Same author

Towards precision medicine: What are the stratification hypotheses to identify homogeneous inflammatory subgroups.

European neuropsychopharmacology : the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology·2020
Same author

Major depression, sleep, hostility and body mass index are associated with impaired quality of life in schizophrenia. Results from the FACE-SZ cohort.

Journal of affective disorders·2020
Same author

Confirmations, advances and recommendations for the daily care of schizophrenia based on the French national FACE-SZ cohort.

Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry·2020
Same author

Sexual dysfunctions are associated with major depression, chronic inflammation and anticholinergic consumption in the real-world schizophrenia FACE-SZ national cohort.

Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry·2019
Same author

Towards an improved access to psychiatric rehabilitation: availability and effectiveness at 1-year follow-up of psychoeducation, cognitive remediation therapy, cognitive behaviour therapy and social skills training in the FondaMental Advanced Centers of Expertise-Schizophrenia (FACE-SZ) national cohort.

European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience·2019
Same journal

[Not Available].

European journal of nuclear medicine·2016
Same journal

A Window on Latin America.

European journal of nuclear medicine·2016
Same journal

Erratum: Eur J Nucl Med (1999) 26: 686-692.

European journal of nuclear medicine·2016
Same journal

Nuclear medicine in the next decade.

European journal of nuclear medicine·2014
Same journal

Erratum: Impact of attenuation correction on the accuracy of FDG-PET in patients with abdominal tumors: a free-response ROC analysis.

European journal of nuclear medicine·2014
Same journal

(99m)Tc(V)DMSA quantitatively predicts (188)Re(V)DMSA distribution in patients with prostate cancer metastatic to bone.

European journal of nuclear medicine·2014
See all related articles

Processing methods significantly impact single-photon emission tomography (SPET) analysis accuracy. Storing original SPET data allows users to apply custom processing for reliable patient comparisons.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Nuclear Medicine
  • Quantitative Analysis

Background:

  • Existing quantitative bull's-eye database programs offer limited analytical flexibility.
  • User-defined processing is crucial for accurate comparisons of patient data with reference databases.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a flexible bull's-eye analysis method.
  • To investigate the impact of different processing techniques on SPET data comparisons.

Main Methods:

  • Generated male and female bull's-eye databases from 32 normal patients.
  • Applied three distinct reprocessing and comparison approaches to patient data.
  • Evaluated differences using peak value circumferential plotting, average vs. peak profiles, and smoothing vs. resolution recovery prefilters.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Significant variations in detected abnormal regions were observed across the three processing methods.
  • The choice of SPET processing directly influences the accuracy of patient-to-database comparisons.

Conclusions:

  • SPET data processing significantly affects the interpretation of quantitative bull's-eye analysis.
  • Clinical normal reference information should comprise original SPET data, not preprocessed files.
  • Users should apply their own processing methods to raw data for accurate patient comparisons.