Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Teaching laparoscopic surgery: the need for guidelines

C M Royston1, M R Lansdown, W A Brough

  • 1Hull Royal Infirmary.

BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)
|April 16, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Laparoscopic fundoplication: a 10-year learning curve.

Surgical endoscopy·2006
Same author

Surgical pathological second opinion in thyroid malignancy: impact on patients' management and prognosis.

European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology·2005
Same author

Laparoscopic transperitoneal adrenalectomy.

Surgical endoscopy·2003
Same author

Objective comparison of stapled anopexy and open hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, controlled trial.

Diseases of the colon and rectum·2002
Same author

Cost-utility analysis of open versus laparoscopic groin hernia repair: results from a multicentre randomized clinical trial (Br J Surg 2001; 88: 653-61).

The British journal of surgery·2001
Same author

Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair. A 7-year two-center experience in 3017patients.

Surgical endoscopy·2001
Same journal

Covid-19 vaccine study pulled by US CDC is finally published.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026
Same journal

The doctor will post you now.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026
Same journal

RSV vaccination programme expanded to thousands more vulnerable people.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026
Same journal

Adult gender dysphoria services after the Levy review.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026
Same journal

Blood pressure and cholesterol levels between normal weight and obese adults have narrowed thanks to medications, study says.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026
Same journal

Amos review fallout: national maternity adviser demands answers over removal of "normal birth" harms.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026
See all related articles

Minimally invasive surgery requires public trust, achievable through accredited training programs. Addressing training costs and establishing national audits are crucial for surgeon accreditation and patient safety.

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Education
  • Patient Safety
  • Medical Accreditation

Background:

  • Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) faces public trust challenges.
  • Lack of standardized training and accreditation may hinder MIS adoption.
  • Potential for MIS to fall into disrepute without public reassurance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a framework for assuring the public regarding minimally invasive surgery.
  • To advocate for a recognized accreditation system for surgeons.
  • To address the financial implications of surgical training.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of the necessity for accreditation in surgical training.
  • Proposal for the role of royal colleges in maintaining standards.
  • Emphasis on the importance of a national audit of procedures.
Keywords:
CritiqueDelivery Of Health CareDeveloped CountriesEducationEndoscopyEuropeExaminations And DiagnosesHealthHealth PersonnelLaparoscopyNorthern EuropePhysical Examinations And DiagnosesPhysiciansRecommendationsTraining ActivitiesTraining ProgramsTraining TechnicsUnited Kingdom

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Accreditation following recognized training schemes can enhance public confidence.
  • Investment in adequate surgical training may reduce litigation costs.
  • Clear standards and oversight are essential for MIS quality.

Conclusions:

  • Accreditation and standardized training are vital for the future of minimally invasive surgery.
  • Royal colleges should lead in setting standards, accreditation criteria, and national audits.
  • Addressing training costs is essential for sustainable, high-quality surgical practice.