Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Research and quality management studies: ethical considerations

P A Mayhew

    Medsurg Nursing : Official Journal of the Academy of Medical-Surgical Nurses
    |April 1, 1994
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Communication from individuals with advanced DAT: can it provide clues to their sense of self-awareness and well-being?

    Geriatric nursing (New York, N.Y.)·2001
    Same author

    Restraint reduction: research utilization and case study with cognitive impairment.

    Geriatric nursing (New York, N.Y.)·1999
    Same author

    Communicating with individuals with dementia. The impaired person's perspective.

    Journal of gerontological nursing·1999
    Same author

    Academic/practice collaboration for nursing research.

    Medsurg nursing : official journal of the Academy of Medical-Surgical Nurses·1994
    Same author

    Identifying fall risk factors in preparation for reducing the use of restraints.

    Medsurg nursing : official journal of the Academy of Medical-Surgical Nurses·1994
    Same author

    sing research methods in clinical practice.

    Medsurg nursing : official journal of the Academy of Medical-Surgical Nurses·1994

    Federal legislation mandates Institutional Review Board (IRB) oversight for federally funded human subjects research. Ethical principles guide IRB decisions, and similar standards are proposed for Quality Management (QM) studies to protect participants.

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Ethics
    • Health Services Research
    • Quality Management

    Background:

    • Federal legislation mandates Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) to review human subjects research involving federal funding.
    • IRBs ensure protection of human rights through informed consent and adherence to ethical principles: respect for persons, beneficence, and justice.
    • Current standards for Quality Management (QM) studies are less explicit, necessitating ethical guidance.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To explore the applicability of existing ethical principles and IRB review standards to Quality Management (QM) studies.
    • To propose a framework for protecting human subjects in QM research.
    • To address ethical considerations for QM studies, including data privacy and confidentiality.

    Main Methods:

    Keywords:
    Biomedical and Behavioral Research

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of federal legislation and ethical guidelines for human subjects research.
  • Analysis of the ethical principles guiding Institutional Review Boards (IRBs).
  • Proposal of criteria for submitting QM studies to IRBs.
  • Main Results:

    • Existing ethical principles (respect for persons, beneficence, justice) can guide QM study ethical review.
    • Suggested criteria for IRB submission of QM studies include prospective design, scientific merit, and broader applicability.
    • Mechanisms for privacy, confidentiality, and consent are crucial even for studies using existing data.

    Conclusions:

    • Quality Management (QM) studies involving human subjects should adopt ethical frameworks similar to traditional research.
    • Institutional Review Board (IRB) review is recommended for prospective QM studies with scientific merit or broader implications.
    • Ensuring participant privacy, confidentiality, and consent is paramount in all QM research, regardless of data source.