Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Laparoscopic versus subinguinal varicocelectomy: a comparative study

E Enquist1, B S Stein, M Sigman

  • 1Division of Urology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.

Fertility and Sterility
|June 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A lateral-to-mesial organization of human ventral visual cortex at birth.

Brain structure & function·2018
Same author

Parent coaching increases the parents' capacity for reflection and self-evaluation: results from a clinical trial in autism.

Attachment & human development·2018
Same author

High-quality human and rat spermatozoal RNA isolation for functional genomic studies.

Andrology·2018
Same author

Intra- and inter-individual differences in human sperm DNA methylation.

Andrology·2016
Same author

The interface between the psychobiological and cognitive models of attachment.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2014
Same author

Assessment of EndoPAT scores in men with vasculogenic and non-vasculogenic erectile dysfunction.

International journal of clinical practice·2012
Same journal

Uterus-Sparing Laparoscopic Reversal of Complete Non-Puerperal uterine Inversion: A rare Case and Challenging Procedure!

Fertility and sterility·2026
Same journal

Minimally Invasive, Fertility-Sparing Surgical Management of Multiple Bilateral Ovarian Dermoid Cysts.

Fertility and sterility·2026
Same journal

Preconception dietary patterns in association with live birth and pregnancy loss: a couples-based approach.

Fertility and sterility·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to "Clinical management of mosaic results from preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy of blastocysts: a committee opinion" [Fertil Steril 2023;120:973-82].

Fertility and sterility·2026
Same journal

Expression of concern 'Adhesion formation after intracapsular myomectomy with or without adhesion barrier' [Fertil Steril 2011; 95:1780-5].

Fertility and sterility·2026
Same journal

Ovarian stimulation with follitropin δ is safe and effective: results from the RITA randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials.

Fertility and sterility·2026
See all related articles

Subinguinal varicocele repair offers a faster recovery than laparoscopic surgery, with similar pain management. This approach is recommended for quicker patient return to work.

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Surgical Techniques
  • Reproductive Medicine

Background:

  • Varicocelectomy is a surgical procedure to correct varicoceles, a common cause of male infertility.
  • Minimally invasive laparoscopic techniques are increasingly used for varicocelectomy.
  • Comparing surgical approaches is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the postoperative morbidity and pain between laparoscopic and subinguinal varicocelectomy.
  • To determine the relative advantages of each surgical approach for varicocele repair.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective study of 47 patients with infertility undergoing varicocelectomy.
  • Patients chose between laparoscopic or open subinguinal varicocele repair.
  • Outcomes measured included pain medication use, analgesic duration, and time off work.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • No significant difference in analgesic use between laparoscopic and subinguinal groups.
  • Laparoscopic varicocelectomy patients required significantly more time off work (6.4 days) compared to subinguinal repair (2.6 days).

Conclusions:

  • Subinguinal varicocele repair with local anesthesia is safe and associated with lower morbidity.
  • Subinguinal repair provides a quicker recovery period than laparoscopic varicocelectomy.
  • Laparoscopic approaches do not offer a shorter recovery compared to subinguinal methods.