Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluation of three portable suction devices

E J Simon1, J A Davidson, S J Boom

  • 1Department of Anaesthesia, Western Infirmary, Glasgow.

Anaesthesia
|September 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary

Portable suction devices offer comparable performance to wall-mounted units for aspirating gastric contents. Device selection depends on specific clinical needs, considering factors like size and power.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Peripheral blood mononuclear cell mitochondrial enzyme activity is associated with parity and lactation performance in early lactation Holstein dairy cows.

Journal of dairy science·2022
Same author

A review of the current public health practice for contact tracing in relation to laryngeal TB in England 2012-2016.

Public health·2020
Same author

Glycaemic target attainment in people with Type 2 diabetes treated with insulin glargine/lixisenatide fixed-ratio combination: a post hoc analysis of the LixiLan-O and LixiLan-L trials.

Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association·2019
Same author

Technical note: An evaluation of technology-recorded rumination and feeding behaviors in dairy heifers.

Journal of dairy science·2019
Same author

Distribution and Survival of Ascochyta Blight Pathogens in Field-Pea-Cropping Soils of Australia.

Plant disease·2019
Same author

Temporal and Spatial Development of Cercospora Leaf Spot of Faba Bean Influenced by In Situ Inoculum.

Plant disease·2019

Area of Science:

  • Medical Devices
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Respiratory Care

Background:

  • Effective airway management is critical in emergency and critical care settings.
  • Portable suction devices are essential for clearing airway obstructions, including gastric contents.
  • Comparison of portable suction unit performance against established systems is necessary for optimal clinical use.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate and compare the performance of three portable suction devices against a standard wall-mounted suction unit.
  • To assess the efficiency of portable suction devices in aspirating mock gastric contents.

Main Methods:

  • Evaluation of three portable suction devices: Repro-med Res-Q-Vac, Dräger Sujector 2000, and Laerdal suction unit.
  • Comparison against a wall-mounted Ohmeda suction unit.
  • Measurement of the time required to aspirate 140 ml of mock gastric contents for each device.

Main Results:

  • The Repro-med Res-Q-Vac achieved aspiration in a mean of 7.39 seconds (range 4.3-10.4).
  • The Dräger Sujector 2000 averaged 8.6 seconds (range 7.8-9.4) for aspiration.
  • The Laerdal suction unit took a mean of 11.4 seconds (range 9.4-12.6), comparable to the Ohmeda unit's 7.27 seconds (range 6.2-8.9).

Conclusions:

  • Portable suction devices demonstrate performance competitive with wall-mounted systems.
  • Factors such as size, power source, and portability influence the suitability of each device for specific clinical scenarios.
  • Clinical choice should balance performance with practical considerations for different healthcare environments.

Related Experiment Videos