Research in higher surgical training--the West Midlands view

A questionnaire on the role of research in higher surgical training was posted to all in-post NHS Consultants (n = 96) and Higher Surgical Trainees (n = 42) in the West Midlands Region. Replies were received from 80 consultants (83 per cent) and 37 trainees (88 per cent). Over 95 per cent of responders had undertaken some research activity previously. The vast majority of consultants (90 per cent) and trainees (95 per cent) thought that their research period had been beneficial; most would undertake research again even if not essential for higher surgical training (consultants 80 per cent, trainees 70 per cent). Research was felt to be essential for all trainees by 50 per cent of respondents in both groups; 78 per cent of consultants and 86 per cent of trainees also thought that all potential academics should obtain a degree by thesis. Most of the study participants thought that the appropriate time for research activity was as a post-FRCS registrar (consultants 72 per cent, trainees 80 per cent); 80 per cent of consultants and 67 per cent of trainees felt that this research period should be funded by the NHS. A planned, supervised and funded one-year period of research was favoured by the majority of consultants (54 per cent) and trainees (73 per cent) for non-academic general surgical trainees in the future.