Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Subperiosteal implants

R O Stvrtecky1, Z A Borgetti, M Manzano

  • 1National Institute of Aerospace Medicine, Asociacion Odontologica Argentina, Clinica de Extension Do cente en Prostodonica, Buenos Aires.

The Journal of Oral Implantology
|January 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

From bone replacement to regeneration. A biomaterials started journey.

Materials today. Bio·2026
Same author

Anti-inflammatory and antibacterial hydrogel based on a polymerizable ionic liquid.

Acta biomaterialia·2025
Same author

Unravelling groundwater and surface water sources in the Esteros del Iberá Wetland Area: An isotopic approach.

The Science of the total environment·2022
Same author

Key hydrological processes in the Del Azul Creek basin, sub-humid Pampean Plain.

The Science of the total environment·2020
Same author

Activity evaluation of pure and doped zinc oxide nanoparticles against bacterial pathogens and Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Journal of applied microbiology·2019
Same author

Testing the usefulness of <sup>222</sup>Rn to complement conventional hydrochemical data to trace groundwater provenance in complex multi-layered aquifers. Application to the Úbeda aquifer system (Jaén, SE Spain).

The Science of the total environment·2017
Same journal

A Novel Autologous Root Slice Replantation Technique Applied for Immediate Implantation of Maxillary Central Incisors: A Case Report With 6-Year Review.

The Journal of oral implantology·2026
Same journal

Bone Regeneration Techniques for Dental Implant Placement Comparing the Effect of Graft Material on Bone Volume and Long-Term Graft Stability: A Systematic Review.

The Journal of oral implantology·2026
Same journal

Preemptive Analgesia With Steroidal and Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs in Dental Implant Surgeries: A Systematic Review.

The Journal of oral implantology·2026
Same journal

Recruitment of Rat Bone Marrow-Derived Cells to Dental Implants Immediately After Installation.

The Journal of oral implantology·2026
Same journal

Impact of Operator Experience on Accuracy and Procedure Time in Dynamic Navigation, Static-Guided, Freehand Implant Placement: An In Vitro Study.

The Journal of oral implantology·2026
Same journal

Implant Education: Practical Hands-On Training.

The Journal of oral implantology·2026
See all related articles

This study reviewed 115 subperiosteal implant cases over 15 years. Mandibular and maxillary interdental implants showed high success rates, especially when opposed by complete dentures.

Area of Science:

  • Oral Surgery
  • Dental Implantology
  • Prosthodontics

Background:

  • Subperiosteal implants are a type of dental implant used to support prostheses.
  • Assessing long-term outcomes of subperiosteal implants is crucial for clinical decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the success rates of 115 subperiosteal implants placed over a 15-year period.
  • To identify factors influencing the success of subperiosteal implants in the maxilla and mandible.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 115 subperiosteal implant cases.
  • Implants categorized by type (Kennedy classes I and II, Universal, interdental).
  • Evaluation of implant survival and success based on duration and opposing prosthesis.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Majority of implants (86%) were placed in women.
  • Most implants had been in place for 5 to 10 years (58.3%).
  • Highest success rates observed for completed designs in the mandible and interdental implants in the maxilla, particularly when opposed by complete dentures.

Conclusions:

  • Subperiosteal implants, specifically mandibular completed designs and maxillary interdental types, demonstrate favorable long-term success.
  • The nature of the opposing prosthesis significantly impacts the success of subperiosteal implants, with complete dentures yielding superior outcomes.