Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluating ethics committees: a view from the outside

D E Hoffmann1

  • 1University of Maryland School of Law, Baltimore 21201-1786.

The Milbank Quarterly
|January 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Maryland's Experience With the COVID-19 Surge: What Worked, What Didn't, What Next?

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2020
Same author

Science and regulation. Probiotics: finding the right regulatory balance.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2013
Same author

Health claim regulation of probiotics in the USA and the EU: is there a middle way?

Beneficial microbes·2012
Same author

Can state medical boards adequately respond to reports that physicians are inappropriately prescribing opioids?

Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics·2007
Same author

Tibial tuberosity advancement in 65 canine stifles.

Veterinary and comparative orthopaedics and traumatology : V.C.O.T·2006
Same author

Regulating research with decisionally impaired individuals: are we making progress?

DePaul journal of health care law·2006
Same journal

Chronic Absence as a Public Health Priority: A Framework for Coordinated Action.

The Milbank quarterly·2026
Same journal

A New Playbook: State-Driven Solutions for Resilient Health Data.

The Milbank quarterly·2026
Same journal

How Does SNAP Access Prior to Pregnancy Affect Maternal and Infant Health Outcomes?

The Milbank quarterly·2026
Same journal

Firearms as a Market-Driven Epidemic: Potential Pathways to Reduce Preventable Firearm-Related Harm in the United States.

The Milbank quarterly·2026
Same journal

State Choices, Unequal Access: Policies Shaping Reproductive Health Care Across the United States.

The Milbank quarterly·2026
Same journal

Rural Health at a Crossroads: How Policymakers Have Failed Rural America and What Can Be Done for a Healthier Tomorrow.

The Milbank quarterly·2026
See all related articles

Hospital ethics committees are widespread but lack effectiveness data. A new framework evaluating their patient safeguarding role suggests current committees may not outperform alternative patient protection methods.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Healthcare Policy
  • Hospital Administration

Background:

  • Over 60% of hospitals utilize ethics committees voluntarily.
  • There is a notable lack of data regarding the effectiveness of these committees.
  • A consensus on the primary purpose of ethics committees is missing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To establish a policy-driven purpose for ethics committees: safeguarding patient interests.
  • To propose a framework for evaluating ethics committees based on patient welfare.
  • To assess the current performance of ethics committees against defined criteria.

Main Methods:

  • Defined evaluation criteria: access, quality, and cost-effectiveness.
  • Reviewed existing data to assess ethics committees using these criteria.
Keywords:
Analytical ApproachBioethics and Professional EthicsEmpirical ApproachProfessional Patient Relationship

Related Experiment Videos

  • Compared the performance of ethics committees to alternative patient protection mechanisms.

    • Main Results:

    • A framework for evaluating hospital ethics committees was developed, focusing on patient interests.
    • Analysis of available data indicates questionable performance of ethics committees.
    • Ethics committees' effectiveness is comparable to, not superior to, alternative mechanisms.

    Conclusions:

    • A clear, policy-oriented purpose for ethics committees is crucial for effective evaluation.
    • Current evidence does not support the superiority of ethics committees over other patient safeguarding methods.
    • Further research is needed to optimize the role and effectiveness of hospital ethics committees.