Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

MEG and EEG in epilepsy: is there a difference?

C N Guy1, S Walker, G Alarcon

  • 1Physics Department, Imperial College, London, UK.

Physiological Measurement
|November 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary

Scalp electroencephalography (EEG), foramen ovale electrodes, and magnetoencephalography (MEG) capture interictal epileptiform activity. Differences in electric and magnetic waveforms are explained by intracranial depth recordings.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Potential predictive value of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation before chronic cortical stimulation for epilepsia partialis continua.

Brain stimulation·2023
Same author

Depth versus subdural temporal electrodes revisited: Impact on surgical outcome after resective surgery for epilepsy.

Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology·2017
Same author

Oxidative stress dependent microRNA-34a activation via PI3Kα reduces the expression of sirtuin-1 and sirtuin-6 in epithelial cells.

Scientific reports·2016
Same author

Differences in globus pallidus neuronal firing rates and patterns relate to different disease biology in children with dystonia.

Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry·2016
Same author

[Congenital insensitivity to pain: clinical and neurophysiological study in three sisters of a Moroccan family].

Archives de pediatrie : organe officiel de la Societe francaise de pediatrie·2013
Same author

Spanish LupusPRO: cross-cultural validation study for lupus.

Lupus·2013

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Biophysics

Background:

  • Interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) are crucial biomarkers in epilepsy.
  • Scalp electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) are non-invasive methods for detecting IEDs.
  • Foramen ovale electrodes provide semi-invasive intracranial recordings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare interictal epileptiform activity recorded by scalp EEG, foramen ovale electrodes, and MEG.
  • To investigate the reasons for waveform discrepancies between electric and magnetic recordings.

Main Methods:

  • Simultaneous recordings of IEDs using scalp EEG, foramen ovale electrodes, and MEG.
  • Analysis of waveform characteristics, including amplitude, morphology, and spatial distribution.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison with intracranial depth recordings for validation.

    • Main Results:

    • Significant waveform differences were observed between scalp EEG and MEG.
    • Foramen ovale electrode recordings showed distinct patterns compared to scalp-based methods.
    • Intracranial depth recordings helped elucidate the underlying sources of electric and magnetic field generation.

    Conclusions:

    • Scalp EEG and MEG capture different aspects of interictal epileptiform activity.
    • Understanding waveform differences is essential for accurate source localization in epilepsy.
    • Combined use of non-invasive and semi-invasive techniques may improve the understanding of epileptic networks.