Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparing steady counterflow separation with differential chromatography

D K Roper1, E N Lightfoot

  • 1Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison 53706.

Journal of Chromatography. A
|November 12, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bioseparations.

Biotechnology and bioengineering·2004
Same author

Adsorptive membrane chromatography for purification of plasmid DNA.

Journal of chromatography. A·2003
Same author

Refining the scale-up of chromatographic separations.

Journal of chromatography. A·1998
Same author

Measuring column void volumes with NMR.

Analytical chemistry·1997
Same author

A model for multiple subcutaneous insulin injections developed from individual diabetic patient data.

The American journal of physiology·1995
Same author

High-resolution chromatography of proteins in short columns and adsorptive membranes.

Bioseparation·1994
Same journal

Separation and enrichment of phages at the interface between two phases in a green solvent-based sugaring-out extraction system.

Journal of chromatography. A·2026
Same journal

Advances and perspectives in Oligo(dT) Affinity chromatography for mRNA capture: Resins, ligands and process intensification.

Journal of chromatography. A·2026
Same journal

Ion chromatography: Current strengths, key limitations, and future trends.

Journal of chromatography. A·2026
Same journal

Stereo-sensitive modelling of gas chromatographic retention indices of mono-cycloalkanes in jet fuel range.

Journal of chromatography. A·2026
Same journal

Approaches to using retention indices with coupled column pressure tuning in gas chromatography.

Journal of chromatography. A·2026
Same journal

MOF-supported surface-imprinted polymer for hazard governance of aristolochic acids in herbal matrices: A safety-control strategy supported by multiscale simulations.

Journal of chromatography. A·2026
See all related articles

Steady solid-fluid counterflow offers significant advantages over traditional chromatography for separating closely related solutes. This method substantially reduces solvent and solid-phase requirements, making separations more efficient and cost-effective.

Area of Science:

  • Chemical Engineering
  • Separation Science
  • Chromatography

Background:

  • Separating closely related solutes presents a significant challenge in various chemical and biological processes.
  • Conventional chromatographic methods often require substantial solvent and stationary phase volumes, impacting cost and efficiency.
  • Steady solid-fluid counterflow offers a potential alternative for enhanced separation performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the separation efficiency of steady solid-fluid counterflow with traditional fixed chromatographic beds.
  • To derive analogous expressions for key separation parameters like exit concentration and mean residence time for both systems.
  • To quantify the potential savings in product dilution, solvent, and solid-phase requirements offered by counterflow separation.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Development of analogous mathematical expressions for exit concentration and mean residence time in counterflow and fixed-bed chromatography.
  • Derivation of a resolution counterpart for binary steady counterflow separations.
  • Comparison of estimated counterflow savings with experimental data from adsorptive simulated moving beds.
  • Analysis of a specific size-exclusion protein separation case study.

Main Results:

  • Analogous expressions for exit concentration and mean residence time were successfully derived for both counterflow and fixed-bed systems.
  • A resolution parameter for binary steady counterflow separations was established.
  • Estimated savings in solvent and solid-phase volume for counterflow were validated against experimental data.
  • Counterflow separation demonstrated substantial decreases in solvent and resin usage compared to conventional batch chromatography for protein separation.

Conclusions:

  • Steady solid-fluid counterflow provides a more efficient separation method for closely related solutes compared to traditional chromatography.
  • The derived expressions enable quantitative estimation of savings in solvent and solid-phase requirements.
  • Counterflow technology offers significant economic and environmental benefits by reducing material consumption in separation processes.