Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Methods in heart rate variability analysis: which tachogram should we choose?

M J Janssen1, C A Swenne, J de Bie

  • 1Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Hospital, Netherlands.

Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
|September 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

An adverse outcome pathway for DNA adduct formation leading to kidney failure.

Toxicology·2025
Same author

KCNJ16-depleted kidney organoids recapitulate tubulopathy and lipid recovery upon statins treatment.

Stem cell research & therapy·2024
Same author

Development of an adverse outcome pathway network for nephrotoxicity.

Archives of toxicology·2024
Same author

Co-axial printing of convoluted proximal tubule for kidney disease modeling.

Biofabrication·2022
Same author

Capacity of Trolox to improve the development and quality of metabolically compromised bovine oocytes and embryos invitro during different windows of development.

Reproduction, fertility, and development·2021
Same author

Comparison of PR, QRS, and QT interval measurements by seven ECG interpretation programs.

Journal of electrocardiology·2020

The way cardiac rhythm is represented significantly impacts heart rate variability analysis. Normalizing the cardiotachogram (heart rate data) is crucial for accurate low-frequency and high-frequency power interpretation.

Area of Science:

  • Physiology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Data Analysis

Background:

  • Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis is vital for assessing autonomic nervous system function.
  • Different representations of cardiac rhythm (cardiotachograms) may influence HRV spectral index calculations.
  • Understanding these influences is key to standardizing HRV research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the practical impact of various cardiotachogram representations on spectral HRV indexes.
  • To compare low-frequency (LF) and high-frequency (HF) power estimations using different tachogram types.
  • To determine the necessity of tachogram normalization for comparable HRV results.

Main Methods:

  • Compared five common cardiotachogram types: inter-beat interval series, counts, and instantaneous heart rate series.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Measured HRV in seven volunteers in supine and standing positions.
  • Calculated ratios and deviations of LF and HF power values derived from different tachograms, with and without heart rate normalization.

    • Main Results:

    • Mean LF power deviations ranged from 0-5%, while HF power deviations ranged from 6-37%.
    • The 'counts' tachogram representation yielded significantly higher HF power (15-37%) on average.
    • Spectra were incomparable without normalization of the cardiotachogram relative to heart rate.

    Conclusions:

    • The selection of a specific cardiotachogram representation can lead to divergent conclusions regarding vagal tone in HRV.
    • Inconsistent findings across HRV studies may stem from the omission of tachogram normalization.
    • Standardizing cardiotachogram representation and applying normalization are recommended for reliable HRV analysis.