Related Experiment Videos
Method of recruiting subjects and performance on cognitive tests
P D Tomporowski1, R G Simpson, L Hager
1Department of Psychology, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa 35487-0348.
Summary
Monetary incentives slightly improved college students' attention and memory test performance. Course credit incentives had no effect, highlighting the impact of recruitment methods on psychological research participation.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Cognitive Science
- Research Methodology
Background:
- College students are frequent participants in psychological studies.
- Effective subject recruitment is crucial for research validity.
- Understanding recruitment impacts on performance is essential.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the effects of three recruitment methods on student performance in laboratory tests.
- To compare monetary incentives, course credit incentives, and mandatory participation.
- To investigate if recruitment strategies influence attention and memory test outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Three groups of college students were recruited using different methods: monetary incentives, course credit, and mandatory participation.
- Participants completed laboratory tests measuring sustained attention and recognition memory.
- Performance data was analyzed to compare the three recruitment conditions.
Main Results:
- Monetary incentives led to a significant, albeit small, improvement in sustained attention and recognition memory.
- Course credit incentives did not significantly alter test performance compared to mandatory participation.
- No differences in test performance were observed based on the time of semester the studies were conducted.
Conclusions:
- Monetary incentives can positively influence participant performance in cognitive tasks.
- Course credit incentives may not be sufficient to enhance performance in psychological research.
- Recruitment strategies are a critical factor to consider in the design and interpretation of psychological research involving student participants.