Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Are dermatologists greedy?

R Crawshaw1

  • 1Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland.

Archives of Dermatology
|February 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Physician greed and inappropriate reimbursement are public concerns, yet organized medicine often ignores these issues. This article examines why the medical profession avoids discussing physician compensation and explores potential solutions.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A physician's oath on retirement: the oath marks an important juncture in a physician's life.

The Western journal of medicine·2001
Same author

"Care" that cares: medicine's essential patient-centered ethic.

The Pharos of Alpha Omega Alpha-Honor Medical Society. Alpha Omega Alpha·2000
Same author

Diminished medical morale syndrome. A profession's impairment.

Journal of the South Carolina Medical Association (1975)·2000
Same author

Journalistic integrity vs. commercial profit in medicine.

The Pharos of Alpha Omega Alpha-Honor Medical Society. Alpha Omega Alpha·1999
Same author

Confessions of a beggarly doctor.

The Western journal of medicine·1999
Same author

One faculty's response to the patient-physician covenant.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·1999
Same journal

Scoring With SCORTEN-Reply.

Archives of dermatology·2017
Same journal

Comparison of Early and Late Latent Syphilis- Colorado, 1991.

Archives of dermatology·2016
Same journal

Case of Rhinoscleroma.

Archives of dermatology·2016
Same journal

Cutaneous Fungal Infections.

Archives of dermatology·2016
Same journal

An Ulcerated Plaque in a Gay Man.

Archives of dermatology·2016
Same journal

Solitary Violaceous Nodule on the Face.

Archives of dermatology·2016
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Medical Economics
  • Healthcare Policy
  • Professional Ethics

Background:

  • Public discourse frequently questions physician greed, particularly in dermatology, citing concerns over inflated billing practices.
  • Escalating healthcare costs have intensified scrutiny on medical reimbursement, yet the medical profession remains hesitant to address these issues.
  • Media reports highlight instances of alleged fraud and abuse, such as billing for multiple procedures when only one was performed.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the reasons behind organized medicine's reluctance to engage with the topic of physician greed and inappropriate reimbursement.
  • To investigate the systemic factors contributing to the avoidance of discussions surrounding physician compensation and financial practices.
  • To propose potential remedies and strategies for addressing the diffidence within the medical profession regarding these sensitive issues.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

  • Qualitative analysis of medical economic literature and policy documents.
  • Examination of public and professional discourse on physician compensation and reimbursement.
  • Case study review of reported instances of alleged fraud and abuse in medical billing.

Main Results:

  • Organized medicine's diffidence may stem from a desire to protect professional autonomy and avoid public scrutiny.
  • The complexity of reimbursement models and the potential for inter-specialty conflict contribute to the reluctance to address physician greed.
  • A lack of standardized metrics for evaluating physician compensation and practice patterns exacerbates the issue.

Conclusions:

  • Addressing physician greed and inappropriate reimbursement requires a multi-faceted approach involving transparency, ethical guidelines, and professional accountability.
  • Organized medicine must proactively engage in open dialogue about physician compensation to maintain public trust and ensure equitable healthcare.
  • Developing clearer guidelines and oversight mechanisms for medical billing and reimbursement is crucial for mitigating financial impropriety.