Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Attentional distribution in visual space

C W Eriksen1, K Pan, J Botella

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Illinois, Champaign 61820.

Psychological Research
|January 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sprint interval exercise disrupts mitochondrial ultrastructure driving a unique mitochondrial stress response and remodelling in men.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

The evolving landscape of leptomeningeal metastases from NSCLC: an international, contemporary, multicenter cohort study.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2025
Same author

Precarious employment in self-employment: A typology and impact on cardiovascular health conditions in Sweden.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2025
Same author

BRAIN NETWORK FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY AND CORTICAL ACTIVATION FEATURES DURING THE SWALLOWING TASK FOR THE PATIENTS OF POST STROKE DYSPHAGIA: A MULTI- CHANNEL FNIRS STUDY.

Georgian medical news·2025
Same author

[Genetic evolution analysis of enteric cytopathogenic human orphan virus type 30 in three cases of infants and young children in Hubei Province].

Zhonghua yu fang yi xue za zhi [Chinese journal of preventive medicine]·2025
Same author

A Drug Repurposing Approach Reveals Targetable Epigenetic Pathways in <i>Plasmodium vivax</i> Hypnozoites.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2023
Same journal

Musical training increases anticipatory responding and predictive control in sequence learning.

Psychological research·2026
Same journal

When emotions hurt: negative interpretations of bodily signals and interoceptive difficulties in fibromyalgia.

Psychological research·2026
Same journal

Emotion-specific modality effects in auditory and visual perception of emotion.

Psychological research·2026
Same journal

The effect of retrieval practice on incidental memory is modulated by emotional valence: evidence of ERPs.

Psychological research·2026
Same journal

The length of a piece of string: Where the whole is more than the sum of its constituent parts.

Psychological research·2026
Same journal

The influence of older age, individual differences in cognitive abilities, and state of mind on learning novel categories.

Psychological research·2026
See all related articles

This study measured the visual attentive field using a reaction time task. Incompatible distractors slowed responses more when closer to the attended area, suggesting an inhibitory field.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Perception
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Understanding the spatial extent of visual attention is crucial for cognitive models.
  • Previous research has explored attentional fields, but the precise nature of their boundaries remains debated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the horizontal extent of the visual attentive field.
  • To determine how distractor stimuli influence performance within and around the attended area.

Main Methods:

  • A two-choice reaction time (RT) task was employed with left/right inclined line targets.
  • Match-mismatch stimuli at varying locations manipulated the attended area.
  • Compatible and incompatible distractors were presented at different distances from the attended area and target.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Reaction times increased with incompatible distractors.
  • This increase in RT was inversely related to the distractor's distance from the edge of the attended area.
  • Distractor distance from the target lines did not independently affect RT.

Conclusions:

  • The findings support an inhibitory field model surrounding the attended area.
  • This inhibitory field influences visual attention and distractor processing.
  • The spatial extent of attention is characterized by both facilitatory and inhibitory mechanisms.