Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cognitive representations of functional interactions with objects

R L Klatzky1, J Pellegrino, B P McCloskey

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Barbara 93106-9660.

Memory & Cognition
|May 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Blended learning for accredited life support courses - A systematic review.

Resuscitation plus·2022
Same author

Amplitude Analysis of D_{s}^{+}→π^{+}π^{0}η and First Observation of the W-Annihilation Dominant Decays D_{s}^{+}→a_{0}(980)^{+}π^{0} and D_{s}^{+}→a_{0}(980)^{0}π^{+}.

Physical review letters·2019
Same author

Precision Measurement of the Branching Fractions of η^{'} Decays.

Physical review letters·2019
Same author

Study of the D^{0}→K^{-}μ^{+}ν_{μ} Dynamics and Test of Lepton Flavor Universality with D^{0}→K^{-}ℓ^{+}ν_{ℓ} Decays.

Physical review letters·2019
Same author

Measurement of the Dynamics of the Decays D_{s}^{+}→η^{(')}e^{+}ν_{e}.

Physical review letters·2019
Same author

Evidence of a Resonant Structure in the e^{+}e^{-}→π^{+}D^{0}D^{*-} Cross Section between 4.05 and 4.60 GeV.

Physical review letters·2019
Same journal

Limited protective effects of multilingualism against age-related cognitive decline.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Validation of illustrated texts: Can pictures raise awareness of inconsistencies?

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

4I remember (and forget) your happy smiling face: Directed forgetting of emotionally expressive faces of in-group and out-group members.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Identity in the spotlight: Matching faces without overlapping features.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Test delay and change awareness moderate retroactive and proactive memory effects.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

The Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) illusion in short-term memory: Opposite effects of retention interval on true and false recognition.

Memory & cognition·2026
See all related articles

People understand object interactions through distinct movement and hand configurations. These findings reveal cognitive representations of actions, impacting motor and memory performance.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Motor Control
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

  • Understanding how humans perceive and represent object-interaction movements is crucial for fields like robotics and cognitive science.
  • Previous research has explored action representation, but the specific underlying dimensions of functional object interactions remain less understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the cognitive representations of functional object-interaction movements.
  • To identify the key dimensions people use to judge the similarity of object-interaction actions.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted involving human subjects.
  • Experiment 1 used a rating scale to assess actions across six dimensions (limb portion, distance, forcefulness, effectors, contact surface, grasp resemblance).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Experiment 2 employed similarity sorting, clustering, and multidimensional scaling to analyze movement similarity judgments.

    • Main Results:

    • Action ratings in Experiment 1 revealed two primary underlying factors: limb movement and effector configuration.
    • Similarity judgments in Experiment 2 were influenced by the initial six dimensions, plus additional parameters.
    • The results indicate that people possess specific, cognitively accessible representations of functional actions.

    Conclusions:

    • Cognitive representations of functional object interactions are structured and accessible.
    • These findings have implications for understanding motor control and memory.
    • The identified dimensions can inform the design of more intuitive human-robot interactions and memory aids.