Related Experiment Videos
Changes in synaptic density after developmental compression or expansion of retinal input to the superior colliculus
1Department of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853.
The Journal of Comparative Neurology
|April 22, 1993
Summary
Altering retinal input to the superior colliculus affects synaptic density. Monocular enucleation reduced retinocollicular (RLP) synapse density, while tectal ablation did not alter synaptic density or types.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Developmental Biology
- Synaptic Plasticity
Background:
- The superior colliculus (SC) receives retinal input, and its density can be altered by developmental manipulations.
- Variations in input convergence may be compensated by changes in synaptic features like number, arborization, or density.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how neonatal partial tectal ablation or monocular enucleation affects synaptic length, density, and synapse class proportions in the hamster SC.
- To understand the compensatory mechanisms at the synaptic level in response to altered visual input.
Main Methods:
- Neonatal partial tectal ablation and monocular enucleation were performed in hamsters.
- Synaptic density, length, and class proportions were analyzed in the superficial gray layer of the SC using electron microscopy.
Main Results:
- Monocular enucleation significantly reduced synaptic density in the ipsilateral SC, specifically decreasing the number of retinocollicular (RLP) synapses.
- RLP synapses were larger in monocular enucleates, but no compensatory increase in other synapse types was observed.
- Partial tectal ablation did not affect overall synaptic density or the proportion of synapse types, though RLP synapses were slightly smaller.
Conclusions:
- Synaptic density in the SC may be regulated by the number of incoming inputs, potentially operating at a maximum capacity.
- Decreasing the number of inputs reduces density, suggesting a lack of competition between different terminal classes.
- Postsynaptic cells appear to control the types and numbers of their potential inputs, rather than input terminals competing for space.