Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Medicaid: taking stock

S M Davidson1

  • 1Boston University.

Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law
|January 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

States underinvest in Medicaid data crucial for policy analysis, leading to costly errors. Policy analyses often neglect political factors, causing unintended consequences for healthcare access for the poor.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Inter-organ communication: pathways and targets to cardioprotection and neuro-protection. A report from the 12th Hatter Cardiovascular Institute workshop.

Basic research in cardiology·2024
Same author

The Infarct-Limiting Effect of Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Rats Is Not Affected by Aspirin.

Cardiovascular drugs and therapy·2023
Same author

Remote ischaemic conditioning: defining critical criteria for success-report from the 11th Hatter Cardiovascular Workshop.

Basic research in cardiology·2022
Same author

Cigarette-smoking characteristics and interest in cessation in patients with head-and-neck cancer.

Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)·2020
Same author

Targeting myocardial ischaemic injury in the absence of reperfusion.

Basic research in cardiology·2020
Same author

How can we better help cancer patients quit smoking? The London Regional Cancer Program experience with smoking cessation.

Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)·2018
Same journal

Still Learning from Oregonians About Medicaid.

Journal of health politics, policy and law·2026
Same journal

Communicative Infrastructure and the Global Diffusion of Latin American Food Policy.

Journal of health politics, policy and law·2026
Same journal

Frankenstein or My Fair Lady? Lessons on Participatory Governance from Oregon Medicaid's Priority-Setting Experiment.

Journal of health politics, policy and law·2026
Same journal

How Medicare Advantage Enrollment Affects Spending in Traditional Medicare: Spillovers and Implications for MA Benchmarks.

Journal of health politics, policy and law·2026
Same journal

Abortion Politics: Physician Mobilization in the Wake of the Dobbs Decision.

Journal of health politics, policy and law·2026
Same journal

When Protections Work but Processes Stall: Evaluating the No Surprises Act's Implementation Record.

Journal of health politics, policy and law·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Health Policy
  • Public Health
  • Healthcare Management

Background:

  • Medicaid has garnered significant attention, evidenced by multiple publications in the Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law.
  • This paper offers a comprehensive critique of recent articles on Medicaid, expanding the typical scope of analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate existing Medicaid policy analyses.
  • To identify key areas for improvement in Medicaid program data, policy formulation, and implementation.
  • To examine the effectiveness of Medicaid in providing healthcare access to low-income populations.

Main Methods:

  • Critique of five recent articles on the Medicaid program.
  • Analysis of policy implications derived from the reviewed literature.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of the political and economic factors influencing Medicaid's effectiveness.
  • Main Results:

    • States inadequately invest in producing data suitable for policy analysis and research.
    • Existing policy analyses often overlook the political dimensions of policy, leading to unexpected outcomes.
    • Medicaid incentives frequently fail to achieve desired effects due to the program's limited market share.
    • Political and economic constraints prevent Medicaid from fully realizing its original goals of providing reliable mainstream healthcare access to the poor.

    Conclusions:

    • Enhanced investment in data collection and analysis is essential for states to avoid policy mistakes.
    • Integrating political considerations into policy analysis can mitigate unintended consequences.
    • Improving Medicaid's efficiency and effectiveness is crucial, though its potential is limited by inherent political and economic factors.