Related Experiment Videos
Thinking about strategies during, before, and after making a decision
1Behavioral Science Department, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington 40536-0086.
Psychology and Aging
|June 1, 1993
Summary
Think-aloud instructions prolonged decision times for all adults but did not alter decision processes. Self-report methods were found to be nonreactive, indicating these instructions do not explain cognitive aging differences.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Developmental Psychology
- Gerontology
Background:
- Cognitive aging research often employs think-aloud and self-report methods to study decision-making.
- Understanding the impact of these methodological choices on performance across age groups is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how think-aloud and self-report instructions influence decision-making performance in young and older adults.
- To determine if these instructions exacerbate or explain age-related cognitive differences.
Main Methods:
- Two studies were conducted involving young and older adult participants.
- Participants were assigned to either think-aloud or self-report conditions during decision-making tasks.
Main Results:
- Think-aloud instructions increased overall decision time for both age groups without significantly altering decision processes.
- Younger adults in the think-aloud condition rechecked information more often than older adults.
- Self-report methods demonstrated nonreactivity, confirming their reliability.
Conclusions:
- Neither think-aloud nor self-report instructions appear to compound or explain age-related differences in cognitive functioning.
- Methodological choices in cognitive aging research do not inherently create or magnify performance disparities between age groups.