Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Mammography quality assurance. Current issues

R E Hendrick1

  • 1Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver.

Cancer
|August 15, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Relationship between phantom failure rates and radiation dose in mammography accreditation.

Medical physics·2002
Same author

Rates and causes of disagreement in interpretation of full-field digital mammography and film-screen mammography in a diagnostic setting.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2001
Same author

Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: results of 4,945 paired examinations.

Radiology·2001
Same author

Breast imaging using an amorphous silicon-based full-field digital mammographic system: stability of a clinical prototype.

Journal of digital imaging·2000
Same author

Optimizing techniques in screen-film mammography.

Radiologic clinics of North America·2000
Same author

Correlation of high-resolution breast MR imaging with histopathology; validation of a technique.

Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI·2000
Same journal

Long-term outcomes of evolving treatment regimens in Ewing sarcoma survivors diagnosed 1970-1999: A report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.

Cancer·2026
Same journal

Large-scale osteosarcoma sequencing reveals age-associated genomic architectures.

Cancer·2026
Same journal

EZH2 inhibitor tazemetostat voluntarily withdrawn from market.

Cancer·2026
Same journal

Nivolumab and chemotherapy combination approved for previously untreated Hodgkin lymphoma.

Cancer·2026
Same journal

Most older patients with advanced cancer prioritize QOL over extending survival: A secondary analysis of the GAP70+ trial found that among adults aged 70 and older with advanced, noncurable cancer, nearly three-quarters prioritized maintaining QOL.

Cancer·2026
Same journal

Real-world safety, prognostic, and design considerations in ketogenic diet trials for pancreatic cancer.

Cancer·2026
See all related articles

High-quality mammography is crucial for early detection. The American College of Radiology (ACR) accreditation and consistent quality assurance are key to maintaining superior mammogram image quality nationwide.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Quality Assurance

Background:

  • Mammography image quality is paramount for accurate diagnosis.
  • Significant advancements in mammography quality have occurred over the last two decades.
  • Access to high-quality mammography is expanding across the United States.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the importance of mammography quality assurance (QA).
  • To emphasize the role of the American College of Radiology (ACR) Mammography Accreditation Program.
  • To discuss legislative efforts and ongoing challenges in mammography quality.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current mammography quality assurance practices.
  • Analysis of the impact of the ACR Mammography Accreditation Program.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of federal legislation, including the Mammography Quality Standards Act (MQSA).

    • Main Results:

    • ACR accreditation is the most effective method for ensuring high-quality mammograms.
    • Higher mammography volume sites demonstrate superior QA practices and lower failure rates.
    • Over half of US mammography sites are ACR accredited, with more in the process.

    Conclusions:

    • Consistent and effective QA is essential for maintaining superior mammography image quality.
    • The ACR program and federal standards are vital for ensuring mammography quality.
    • Future challenges include improving dense breast imaging and patient tracking for screening efficacy.