Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Interpreting model coefficients when the true model form is unknown

G Maldonado1, S Greenland

  • 1Division of Environmental and Occupational Health, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis 55455.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)
|July 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bone Mass Loss and Sarcopenia in Ecuadorian Patients.

Journal of aging research·2020
Same author

Clinical Characteristics in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Differences between Genders.

TheScientificWorldJournal·2019
Same author

Duodenal membranes: a late diagnosis evidenced by foreign bodies.

Oxford medical case reports·2018
Same author

Angular momentum regulation strategies for highly dynamic landing in Parkour.

Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering·2017
Same author

Two glutathione transferase isoforms isolated from juvenile cysts of Taenia crassiceps: identification, purification and characterization.

Journal of helminthology·2017
Same author

Determination of Vitamin D Status in a Population of Ecuadorian Subjects.

TheScientificWorldJournal·2017
Same journal

Application of the E-value under non-proportional hazards.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Can the All of Us sample be reweighted to mirror a nationally representative sample? A comparison of mortality predictors.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Gut health, systemic inflammation, and linear growth among Indonesian infants: findings from the Action Against Stunting Hub observation cohort: Erratum.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Evaluating Estimators in Partially Identified Models.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Stratification and accumulation? Explaining changing mortality inequities between business owners and non-owners in the U.S. (1984-2022).

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Be wary of age-stratum aging in early-onset cancer trends.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
See all related articles

Mathematical modeling in epidemiology often violates the assumption of correct structural model specification. This means model coefficients may not represent true population parameters, impacting epidemiologic inference and effect summaries.

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Econometrics

Background:

  • Mathematical modeling is crucial in epidemiology for understanding disease dynamics.
  • Epidemiologic studies rely on statistical models with underlying assumptions.
  • A key assumption is the correct specification of the structural model form.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically examine mathematical modeling in epidemiology.
  • To investigate the impact of structural model misspecification on epidemiologic inference.
  • To assess the interpretability of model coefficients as effect summaries.

Main Methods:

  • Review of major assumptions in epidemiologic modeling.
  • Application of concepts from econometrics to assess model misspecification.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of how misspecification affects statistical inference and parameter interpretation.

    • Main Results:

    • The assumption of correct structural model specification is frequently violated in epidemiologic studies.
    • Model coefficients in misspecified models do not represent true population parameters.
    • Interpretations of coefficients vary by model and study design; they approximate log standardized rate ratios in specific cases.

    Conclusions:

    • Model coefficients can serve as reasonable effect summaries in certain epidemiologic contexts.
    • Careful consideration of model specification is necessary for valid epidemiologic inference.
    • The interpretation of model parameters requires awareness of study design and model limitations.