Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Visual acuity: calculating appropriate averages

M J Moseley1, H S Jones

  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, University of Birmingham, UK.

Acta Ophthalmologica
|June 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Physiologically relevant screening of polyphenol-rich commercial preparations for bioactivity in vascular endothelial cells and application to healthy volunteers: A viable workflow and a cautionary tale.

Biochemical pharmacology·2019
Same author

Subretinal membranes are associated with abnormal degrees of pupil "evasion": an index of clinical macular dysfunction.

The British journal of ophthalmology·2006
Same author

Refractive adaptation in amblyopia: quantification of effect and implications for practice.

The British journal of ophthalmology·2004
Same author

The first cut is the deepest: basic surgical training in ophthalmology.

Eye (London, England)·2004
Same author

The state of basic surgical training in the UK: ophthalmology as a case example.

Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine·2004
Same author

Semiautomated computer analysis of vessel growth in preterm infants without and with ROP.

The British journal of ophthalmology·2003
Same journal

Distinguish polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy through choroidal alterations: A systematic review, meta-analysis and narrative synthesis.

Acta ophthalmologica·2026
Same journal

Ocular blood flow and retinal oxygen saturation measurements in central retinal artery occlusion.

Acta ophthalmologica·2026
Same journal

Retinal dystrophies simulating geographic atrophy: A diagnostic challenge.

Acta ophthalmologica·2026
Same journal

Radial outer retina reflectivity (RORR) sign in LAMP2-associated retinopathy.

Acta ophthalmologica·2026
Same journal

Deep learning in glaucoma referral: Performance assessment using a real-world setting.

Acta ophthalmologica·2026
Same journal

Clinical manifestations of dual-gene variants in retinitis pigmentosa.

Acta ophthalmologica·2026
See all related articles

Averaging visual acuity scores is debated. This study offers guidelines and examples to help researchers choose the correct statistical average, such as the arithmetic mean, geometric mean, or median, for their specific data.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Research Methods

Background:

  • The averaging of visual acuity scores is a contentious issue in ophthalmic research.
  • Inconsistent statistical methods can affect study outcomes and comparisons.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the controversy surrounding the averaging of visual acuity scores.
  • To provide clear guidelines for selecting appropriate statistical averages for visual acuity data.
  • To illustrate the application of these guidelines with practical examples.

Main Methods:

  • Review of statistical methods for data aggregation.
  • Analysis of the properties of different averaging techniques (arithmetic mean, geometric mean, median).
  • Development of a decision framework for selecting the most suitable average.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Identification of specific scenarios where each type of average is most appropriate.
  • Demonstration of how different averages can yield varying results.
  • Provision of practical, worked examples for common research situations.

Conclusions:

  • Selecting the correct average for visual acuity data is crucial for accurate research interpretation.
  • The guidelines provided aim to standardize statistical practices in visual acuity research.
  • Investigators are encouraged to carefully consider their data distribution when choosing an averaging method.