[Symptomatic sinus dysfunction. A new use of electrophysiology]

The authors undertook a prospective electrophysiological study of 950 patients: 53 subjects considered to be "controls" since they were free of any history of syncope or faintness were identified, as well as 39 symptomatic subjects with a strong suspicion of sinus dysfunction, since no other detectable cause of fainting episodes was found by extracardiac investigation, 24 hour ECG nor electrophysiology. Following the creation of a computerised tool enabling not only the entry of indirect tests, processing, averaging of results, printing and memorization, but also assistance in interpretation, several electrophysiological parameters were used: heart rate and existence of sinus arrhythmia, Strauss tests with adjusted data or not, effective nodal refractory period, Guize, Narula and Mandel tests, and an atropine (0.03 mg/kg) test which was performed only in the symptomatic group. These tests were studied by single-variate and correlative analysis to define their normal ranges, their critical values and their dependence or independence. The performance of each test (i.e. its efficiency, and the specificity and sensitivity of each critical value) was measured. Tests found to be most useful (specificity and efficiency > 90%) were as follows: Mandel test = CSRT > or = 534 ms, Narula test = TECASA > or = 339 ms, heart rate < or = 55/min, type II, IIa and chaotic Strauss curve associated with a pathological Guize test. The combination of these tests in this algorithm resulted in an increase in sensitivity to 84%, at the price of a very moderate fall in specificity to 87%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)