Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026

Myocardial Infarction and Functional Outcome Assessment in Pigs
Published on: April 25, 2014
The nature and clinical features of myocardial infarction with normal coronary arteriogram
Insights
Acute myocardial infarction can occur without coronary artery disease. This study suggests a thromboembolic event, not coronary spasm, is the likely cause in younger patients with normal arteries.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Internal Medicine
Background:
- Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) typically results from occlusive coronary artery disease.
- A subset of AMI patients present with normal coronary arteriograms, necessitating investigation into alternative etiologies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare clinical characteristics and outcomes of AMI patients with normal coronary arteries versus those with occlusive coronary artery disease.
- To elucidate the underlying mechanisms of AMI in patients with unobstructed coronary arteries.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective case-control study comparing 25 patients with AMI and normal coronary arteries (Group I) to 16 patients with AMI and occlusive coronary artery disease (Group II).
- Analysis of patient demographics, risk factors, preceding symptoms, and post-infarction pain patterns.
Main Results:
- Group I patients were significantly younger (27.5 vs 33.7 years) and had fewer risk factors (40% vs 100%) compared to Group II.
- AMI attacks were unheralded in 96% of Group I patients, contrasting with 69% in Group II.
- Post-infarction pain was more frequent in Group I (44% vs 31%).
Conclusions:
- The findings do not support the coronary spasm theory for AMI with normal coronary arteries.
- A thromboembolic event, independent of atherosclerotic coronary disease, is proposed as the primary mechanism.
- This type of myocardial infarction is presumed to have a benign prognosis.
Abstract:
Six new cases of acute myocardial infarction with normal coronary arteriogram are presented and supplemented by 19 collected cases (group I). These are compared with 16 cases of myocardial infarction caused by occlusive coronary artery disease in a comparable population (group ii). The following significant differences between the two groups are established: patients in group I were younger (27.5 years vs 33.7 years, P less than 0.005); at least one risk factor was present in all patients in group II, but in only 40% of group I (P less than 0.0001). effort angina preceded the attack in ten patients of group II, but in none of group I (P less than 0.0001). The attack was unheralded in 24 of the 25 patients in group I, but was preceded by prodromes in 11 of 16 in group II (P less than 0.0001). Attacks of pain following myocardial infarction occurred in five patients of group 2 and II of group II) (P less than 0.001). Results are discussed in the light of the nature of myocardial infarction in group I. No support is found for the coronary spasm theory. The most likely mechanism for development of myocardial infarction in group I is thought to be a thromboembolic "accident." This accident is not necessarily related to atherosclerotic coronary disease and is presumed to be benign in nature.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Myocarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Coronary Artery Disease II: Pathophysiology
Coronary Artery Disease III: Clinical Manifestations
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies

