Related Experiment Videos
Wave-form characteristics and spatial distribution of evoked spinal electrogram in man
Journal of Neurosurgery
|March 1, 1977
Summary
This study compared human evoked spinal electrograms (SEG) with rabbit cord dorsum potentials (CDP). Findings suggest large nerve fibers are key for SEG generation and reveal insights into spinal cord feedback loops.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Spinal Cord Physiology
- Electrophysiology
Background:
- The evoked spinal electrogram (SEG) is a measure of spinal cord activity.
- Comparing human SEG with animal models like rabbit cord dorsum potential (CDP) can provide valuable insights into spinal cord function.
Purpose of the Study:
- To record and characterize the evoked spinal electrogram (SEG) in humans using epidural recordings.
- To compare human SEG with rabbit cord dorsum potential (CDP).
- To investigate the neural pathways and characteristics of the evoked SEG.
Main Methods:
- Recording of evoked spinal electrograms (SEG) from the epidural space in humans.
- Utilizing continuous epidural block technique.
- Comparison with cord dorsum potentials (CDP) recorded from wakeful rabbits.
- Stimulation of segmental nerves and skin receptors.
Main Results:
- Evoked SEG waveform characteristics were consistent across cervical and lumbar regions in humans.
- SEG generation was primarily linked to stimulation of large nerve fibers (tibial nerve) rather than small fibers (toe skin).
- Observed central latencies suggest a long feedback loop contributing to the P2 wave components.
- Amplitude decline of the N1 wave differed from P2, indicating distinct origins.
- Waveform polarity reversed with anterior epidural electrode placement.
- Human SEG closely resembled rabbit CDP.
Conclusions:
- The evoked spinal electrogram in humans shares significant waveform similarities with rabbit cord dorsum potentials.
- Large diameter afferent nerve fibers play a crucial role in generating the evoked SEG.
- The study provides evidence for a long feedback loop influencing spinal cord activity and highlights differences in the origins of N1 and P2 wave components.