Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Development of outcome-based practice guidelines: a method for structuring problems and synthesizing evidence

D K Owens1, R F Nease

  • 1Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA.

The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement
|July 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Uptake and utilization of directly acting antiviral medications for hepatitis C infection in U.S. veterans.

Journal of viral hepatitis·2014
Same author

A randomized trial of computer-based reminders and audit and feedback to improve HIV screening in a primary care setting.

International journal of STD & AIDS·2009
Same author

Cost-effectiveness of voluntary HIV screening in Russia.

International journal of STD & AIDS·2008
Same author

Validation of two models to estimate the probability of malignancy in patients with solitary pulmonary nodules.

Thorax·2007
Same author

Cost-effectiveness of screening for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis due to chronic hepatitis C.

Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics·2004
Same author

Regionalization of bioterrorism preparedness and response.

Evidence report/technology assessment (Summary)·2004
Same journal

Conference overview: through the patient's eyes--improvement tools for the new millennium.

The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement·2008
Same journal

Balancing accountability and improvement: a case study from Massachusetts.

The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement·2008
Same journal

The new Northwestern Memorial Hospital: planned, constructed, and operated through the patients first philosophy.

The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement·2008
Same journal

Integrating patient satisfaction into performance measurement to meet improvement challenges.

The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement·2008
Same journal

Developing partnerships among patients, families, and staff at the Medical College of Georgia Hospital and Clinics.

The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement·2008
Same journal

Quality improvements in end of life care: insights from two collaboratives.

The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement·2008
See all related articles

Influence diagrams link health interventions to outcomes, improving evidence-based guideline development. This structured approach clarifies benefits, harms, and costs for better health decisions.

Area of Science:

  • Health policy
  • Decision analysis
  • Evidence-based medicine

Background:

  • Guideline development increasingly focuses on methodological rigor.
  • Sound guidelines require a clear link between scientific evidence and intended health outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce influence diagrams as a method for structuring health interventions.
  • To demonstrate how this approach facilitates outcome-based guideline development.

Main Methods:

  • Representing health interventions as influence diagrams (decision models).
  • Identifying intervention benefits, harms, and costs.
  • Establishing explicit links between interventions and health outcomes.
  • Synthesizing evidence to predict intervention effects.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Influence diagrams clarify the relationship between interventions (e.g., PCP prophylaxis, HIV screening) and outcomes (e.g., reduced infections, risk behavior modification).
  • This method highlights the evidence needed to support guideline recommendations.
  • It addresses potential risks (morbidity, mortality) and costs (monetary, side effects) associated with interventions.

Conclusions:

  • Influence diagrams create an explicit link between interventions and outcomes.
  • They focus research questions, replacing broad queries with specific, answerable ones.
  • This approach emphasizes the importance of clearly defined statements regarding benefits and costs.